Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2/18/13 L&L column
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 6089444" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>Beyond the other issues outlined, a 4e game with more than 5 PCs starts to get extremely unwieldy. I consider 5 PCs to be the upper limit; unless the 6th is a striker...and able to resolve his/her actions quickly. This is for multiple reasons and each interacting with the prior issue to compound the problems:</p><p></p><p>1) Time/round goes up.</p><p>2) The potential for time/actor goes up (more players equals higher probability that one of them is math deficient or paralysis through analysis driven).</p><p>3) Encounter budget goes up which in almost all situations (except for an anomalous minion extravaganza) means considerably more total HPs to ablate...especially with multiple Brutes and/or Soldiers.</p><p></p><p>All told, if you do not have (i) a considerable number of strikers making up those 6-10 slots, (ii) considerable action economy buffing leader/striker synergy (warlords granting barbarians MBAs), and (iii) a highly functional group with advanced tactical acumen and quick turn resolution then you will be starring down the gun barrel of a grueling experience. I often wonder if these nightmare scenarios (6-10 PCs, tons of enemy HPs to ablate, horrible synergy and multiple, pure defenders and leaders, poor tactical acumen, long individual turn resolution) are what causes people to say that 4e combat is a "grind". Our combats are fierce and quick; 30 seconds/PC turn (including immediate actions, if any), perhaps 1 minute for my own as GM, 4-5 rounds on average (6 - 8 on L + 5 boss fights). With 3 PCs that is 10 -12 minutes per combat. Hardly a "grind".</p><p></p><p>The bottom line is, in the above scenario, it is highly likely that average rounds of combat would jump from 4-5 rounds to possibly as many as 10. There will be a much larger number of enemies for the Defender to be controlling than during a standard combat with 4-5 PCs (which may be 2-3 typically). If a Defender is controlling 5-6 enemies for most of those 10 rounds and getting hit twice a round for his surge value (and being healed for roughly the same value and expending a surge/heal)...a low level Defender will run out of surges by round 6 or so.</p><p></p><p>Point being, there is a point where the game breaks. My guess is that @<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?6689464-KaiiLurker" target="_blank"><strong>KaiiLurker</strong></a> may have found it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 6089444, member: 6696971"] Beyond the other issues outlined, a 4e game with more than 5 PCs starts to get extremely unwieldy. I consider 5 PCs to be the upper limit; unless the 6th is a striker...and able to resolve his/her actions quickly. This is for multiple reasons and each interacting with the prior issue to compound the problems: 1) Time/round goes up. 2) The potential for time/actor goes up (more players equals higher probability that one of them is math deficient or paralysis through analysis driven). 3) Encounter budget goes up which in almost all situations (except for an anomalous minion extravaganza) means considerably more total HPs to ablate...especially with multiple Brutes and/or Soldiers. All told, if you do not have (i) a considerable number of strikers making up those 6-10 slots, (ii) considerable action economy buffing leader/striker synergy (warlords granting barbarians MBAs), and (iii) a highly functional group with advanced tactical acumen and quick turn resolution then you will be starring down the gun barrel of a grueling experience. I often wonder if these nightmare scenarios (6-10 PCs, tons of enemy HPs to ablate, horrible synergy and multiple, pure defenders and leaders, poor tactical acumen, long individual turn resolution) are what causes people to say that 4e combat is a "grind". Our combats are fierce and quick; 30 seconds/PC turn (including immediate actions, if any), perhaps 1 minute for my own as GM, 4-5 rounds on average (6 - 8 on L + 5 boss fights). With 3 PCs that is 10 -12 minutes per combat. Hardly a "grind". The bottom line is, in the above scenario, it is highly likely that average rounds of combat would jump from 4-5 rounds to possibly as many as 10. There will be a much larger number of enemies for the Defender to be controlling than during a standard combat with 4-5 PCs (which may be 2-3 typically). If a Defender is controlling 5-6 enemies for most of those 10 rounds and getting hit twice a round for his surge value (and being healed for roughly the same value and expending a surge/heal)...a low level Defender will run out of surges by round 6 or so. Point being, there is a point where the game breaks. My guess is that @[URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?6689464-KaiiLurker"][B]KaiiLurker[/B][/URL] may have found it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2/18/13 L&L column
Top