Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2/18/13 L&L column
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6090873" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>No, they're not. It is virtually impossible for the designers of this RPG to be able to accurately determine how often PCs will fall unconscious, how many rounds it would take for them to maybe or maybe not be brought back from consciousness by any possible amount of clerics in a party, and how much damage would be lost or not soaked from those man-rounds of unconsciousness because of the variance of which classes are still on their feet and which ones are or are not engaged in melee with the monsters. Because much of that is also based upon how individual tables play the game.</p><p></p><p>So any attempt at reducing the power of the cleric in direct proportion to the amount of resources they end up saving the party so that you can keep the cleric "balanced" with the other three classes <em>is going to fail</em>. There are TOO MANY VARIABLES.</p><p></p><p>It is impossible to balance every class against every other class in every possible party configuration and every possible game situation. There will ALWAYS be situations where one class (or having more than one of a class) is the OPTIMAL situation to have for a particular encounter. And thus... resources will not be lost as fast, and thus that particular party will get to push on to another encounter that another party wouldn't.</p><p></p><p>And there's nothing wrong with that!</p><p></p><p>So long as 98% of all parties remain comparable to each other and can run between like 3 to 5 encounters, or 4 to 6 encounters... that's good enough.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6090873, member: 7006"] No, they're not. It is virtually impossible for the designers of this RPG to be able to accurately determine how often PCs will fall unconscious, how many rounds it would take for them to maybe or maybe not be brought back from consciousness by any possible amount of clerics in a party, and how much damage would be lost or not soaked from those man-rounds of unconsciousness because of the variance of which classes are still on their feet and which ones are or are not engaged in melee with the monsters. Because much of that is also based upon how individual tables play the game. So any attempt at reducing the power of the cleric in direct proportion to the amount of resources they end up saving the party so that you can keep the cleric "balanced" with the other three classes [I]is going to fail[/I]. There are TOO MANY VARIABLES. It is impossible to balance every class against every other class in every possible party configuration and every possible game situation. There will ALWAYS be situations where one class (or having more than one of a class) is the OPTIMAL situation to have for a particular encounter. And thus... resources will not be lost as fast, and thus that particular party will get to push on to another encounter that another party wouldn't. And there's nothing wrong with that! So long as 98% of all parties remain comparable to each other and can run between like 3 to 5 encounters, or 4 to 6 encounters... that's good enough. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2/18/13 L&L column
Top