Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2/25/2013 L&L: This Week in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nemesis Destiny" data-source="post: 6093946" data-attributes="member: 98255"><p>How is that harsh? If they fail to meet the aim of creating a game that I, as a player of their game, want to play, then they've failed. What do you even mean by "adjust to facts on the ground"? I hope you don't mean what I think you mean by it...</p><p></p><p>And I would not, if it means they fail to capture the audience that the previous edition <strong><em>created</em></strong>.</p><p></p><p>I see no reason why the game can't be stretched in more than one direction simultaneously, even if not at the same table at the same time.</p><p></p><p> I will do so, so long as the environment here remains conducive to doing so, which historically, it hasn't. I can't be bothered with WotC's boards, they're even worse, usually. I do send feedback via their surveys, except for the last one, because I haven't had the patience to slog through the last packet. Things are moving further and further from a game I want to play, so I honestly can't be arsed to do it anymore. I may still fill in the survey just to complain about the direction things are going.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would much sooner see this, honestly, than Next, but I get that there is a better business case for a new edition. If they did go the route you (and I) suggest, they could even start producing *new* products for older editions, which I think would be <em><strong>fantastic</strong></em>.</p><p></p><p>They may end up doing that anyway, but we'll have to wait for Next to flop or get over its first run of option bloat before they go back to producing for older editions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nemesis Destiny, post: 6093946, member: 98255"] How is that harsh? If they fail to meet the aim of creating a game that I, as a player of their game, want to play, then they've failed. What do you even mean by "adjust to facts on the ground"? I hope you don't mean what I think you mean by it... And I would not, if it means they fail to capture the audience that the previous edition [B][I]created[/I][/B]. I see no reason why the game can't be stretched in more than one direction simultaneously, even if not at the same table at the same time. I will do so, so long as the environment here remains conducive to doing so, which historically, it hasn't. I can't be bothered with WotC's boards, they're even worse, usually. I do send feedback via their surveys, except for the last one, because I haven't had the patience to slog through the last packet. Things are moving further and further from a game I want to play, so I honestly can't be arsed to do it anymore. I may still fill in the survey just to complain about the direction things are going. I would much sooner see this, honestly, than Next, but I get that there is a better business case for a new edition. If they did go the route you (and I) suggest, they could even start producing *new* products for older editions, which I think would be [I][B]fantastic[/B][/I]. They may end up doing that anyway, but we'll have to wait for Next to flop or get over its first run of option bloat before they go back to producing for older editions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2/25/2013 L&L: This Week in D&D
Top