Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2/25/2013 L&L: This Week in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nemesis Destiny" data-source="post: 6093991" data-attributes="member: 98255"><p>I agree, but if they have done so, it has not been publicly stated as such. Additionally, if they have changed their goal, then I am certainly no longer interested and would appreciate getting a press release to that effect so I can stop wasting my time here arguing into the wind about it.</p><p></p><p>Well, if it drives me, and a significant enough number of 4e fans away, then it still fails. I guess they didn't cast their net broad enough. Likewise for fans of any other edition, including you.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree, and if in doing so they need to change their design goals, then they should be up front about that. I have less than zero desire to be invested in a process whose final product I won't enjoy.</p><p></p><p>Fair enough, and that is largely made up of the crowd that just wants to play D&D in its newest incarnation. There's nothing wrong with that. But there are a significant number of folks who have developed distinct preferences over the years, and if the game fails to appeal to those people, like you and I, then they are not meeting their stated goal, and hence, failing.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I am being realistic, and I am not talking about their corporate goals at all when I say whether or not it fails. I am only talking about their stated design goals. And if that means they don't appeal to the fans they did create with their "last time", then no, sorry, it will be a failure to meet their stated goal. It can make money, it can do 'alright' and be more popular or at least less reviled by the militant traditionalists than 4e, but it will still represent a failure to meet their design goals. That was my point, and all I am saying when I say that so far Next fails. You can have whatever criteria you like for the success or failure of Next, but that doesn't change what I am saying at all.</p><p></p><p>If they fail to capture my interests and the interests of like-minded gamers, then they've failed to meet their stated aim. Period. This is neither harsh nor unfair, it is an objective truth. If your goal is X, and you fail to meet the definition of X, then you've failed to meet your goal, regardless if you achieve A, B, C, Y, and Z in the process. Heck, if the goal is to meet A, B, C, X, Y, and Z and you miss <strong>any of them</strong>, it's a failure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nemesis Destiny, post: 6093991, member: 98255"] I agree, but if they have done so, it has not been publicly stated as such. Additionally, if they have changed their goal, then I am certainly no longer interested and would appreciate getting a press release to that effect so I can stop wasting my time here arguing into the wind about it. Well, if it drives me, and a significant enough number of 4e fans away, then it still fails. I guess they didn't cast their net broad enough. Likewise for fans of any other edition, including you. I agree, and if in doing so they need to change their design goals, then they should be up front about that. I have less than zero desire to be invested in a process whose final product I won't enjoy. Fair enough, and that is largely made up of the crowd that just wants to play D&D in its newest incarnation. There's nothing wrong with that. But there are a significant number of folks who have developed distinct preferences over the years, and if the game fails to appeal to those people, like you and I, then they are not meeting their stated goal, and hence, failing. I am being realistic, and I am not talking about their corporate goals at all when I say whether or not it fails. I am only talking about their stated design goals. And if that means they don't appeal to the fans they did create with their "last time", then no, sorry, it will be a failure to meet their stated goal. It can make money, it can do 'alright' and be more popular or at least less reviled by the militant traditionalists than 4e, but it will still represent a failure to meet their design goals. That was my point, and all I am saying when I say that so far Next fails. You can have whatever criteria you like for the success or failure of Next, but that doesn't change what I am saying at all. If they fail to capture my interests and the interests of like-minded gamers, then they've failed to meet their stated aim. Period. This is neither harsh nor unfair, it is an objective truth. If your goal is X, and you fail to meet the definition of X, then you've failed to meet your goal, regardless if you achieve A, B, C, Y, and Z in the process. Heck, if the goal is to meet A, B, C, X, Y, and Z and you miss [B]any of them[/B], it's a failure. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2/25/2013 L&L: This Week in D&D
Top