Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
+2 Flaming, Shocking, Frezzing Great Axe
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trimeulose" data-source="post: 253782" data-attributes="member: 1527"><p><strong>3 standard actions or one??</strong></p><p></p><p>One of the biggest issues for balance is the stacking issue what stacks and what doesn't. The general rule is that like bonuses OR PENALTIES do not stack except for certain ones mentioned in the DM guide.</p><p></p><p>If the command word for all enchantments is the same then by definition they are the same TIME PENALTY. Therefore the actions simply overlap one another and you take the greatest penalty. Since all penalties are one standard action the total penalty is one standard action.</p><p></p><p>If however the words are different then they would require a new speech, which would require a new standard action. Thus if Bait is the word for two abilities and say Hook is the word for the third it would require two standard actions to activate ALL abilities.</p><p></p><p>This can be explained logically as well. Lets say that Wizard Zorander (copyright terry goodkind) places the flaming ability on a sword. He decides that the word to activate it should be his grandson so its Richard. Anyone who picks up the sword and says richard makes the sword burst into flame regardless of whether they know of the nature of the sword. Next, The Wizard/Prophet Rahl places the shocking ability on the Sword. he chooses his decendant's name from one thousand years in the future and it is Richard. Again by definition whenever anyone holding the sword says richard it should become electrically charged. </p><p></p><p>Now if anyone can turn on either of these magic abilities when they pick the sword up, then that means they don't have to be concentrating on any particular element for it to surface. So if Kahlan Amnell picks up the sword she doesn't have to be thinking of fire or indeed anything whenever she says richard. Since Richard is the name of her husband then that means that she is probably just saying the name, and if she happens to have the sword in her hand well it will "come to life"</p><p></p><p>Next, Since it is not the persons concentration, but rather the conscious speaking of the word Richard that brings both abilities to life, then it is the words and not the intentions of the person. so regardless of whether the person wants one or the other, or neither attribute to come on when they say the key word, it wont matter. Both attributes will be activated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trimeulose, post: 253782, member: 1527"] [b]3 standard actions or one??[/b] One of the biggest issues for balance is the stacking issue what stacks and what doesn't. The general rule is that like bonuses OR PENALTIES do not stack except for certain ones mentioned in the DM guide. If the command word for all enchantments is the same then by definition they are the same TIME PENALTY. Therefore the actions simply overlap one another and you take the greatest penalty. Since all penalties are one standard action the total penalty is one standard action. If however the words are different then they would require a new speech, which would require a new standard action. Thus if Bait is the word for two abilities and say Hook is the word for the third it would require two standard actions to activate ALL abilities. This can be explained logically as well. Lets say that Wizard Zorander (copyright terry goodkind) places the flaming ability on a sword. He decides that the word to activate it should be his grandson so its Richard. Anyone who picks up the sword and says richard makes the sword burst into flame regardless of whether they know of the nature of the sword. Next, The Wizard/Prophet Rahl places the shocking ability on the Sword. he chooses his decendant's name from one thousand years in the future and it is Richard. Again by definition whenever anyone holding the sword says richard it should become electrically charged. Now if anyone can turn on either of these magic abilities when they pick the sword up, then that means they don't have to be concentrating on any particular element for it to surface. So if Kahlan Amnell picks up the sword she doesn't have to be thinking of fire or indeed anything whenever she says richard. Since Richard is the name of her husband then that means that she is probably just saying the name, and if she happens to have the sword in her hand well it will "come to life" Next, Since it is not the persons concentration, but rather the conscious speaking of the word Richard that brings both abilities to life, then it is the words and not the intentions of the person. so regardless of whether the person wants one or the other, or neither attribute to come on when they say the key word, it wont matter. Both attributes will be activated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
+2 Flaming, Shocking, Frezzing Great Axe
Top