Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Legildur" data-source="post: 2476675" data-attributes="member: 1258">Ahhhh.... I think we probably all do...... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />I don't know if it is just me, but I find those statements are in conflict.I also believe that 'directly towards' means you end up in the closest square from which you can attack, which is by the shortest path.But I disagree with your (and some others') interpretation of the RAW that 2 adjacent allies cannot charge the same opponent.I further disagree that you can interpret that 'any square that is on that side of the target' is a legitimate charge destination - is still has to be by the shortest route.The argument here seems to be about the weighting of the 'directly towards' and 'shortest distance'.&nbsp; Some here interpret that 'directly towards' trumps 'shortest distance', some (including me) say that 'shortest distance' dictates what is 'directly towards'.&nbsp; YMMV.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Legildur, post: 2476675, member: 1258"] Ahhhh.... I think we probably all do...... :-) I don't know if it is just me, but I find those statements are in conflict. I also believe that 'directly towards' means you end up in the closest square from which you can attack, which is by the shortest path. But I disagree with your (and some others') interpretation of the RAW that 2 adjacent allies cannot charge the same opponent. I further disagree that you can interpret that 'any square that is on that side of the target' is a legitimate charge destination - is still has to be by the shortest route. The argument here seems to be about the weighting of the 'directly towards' and 'shortest distance'. Some here interpret that 'directly towards' trumps 'shortest distance', some (including me) say that 'shortest distance' dictates what is 'directly towards'. YMMV. [/QUOTE]

Verification