Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="demon_jr" data-source="post: 565500" data-attributes="member: 3480">Some of my fighting tactics are also based on the composition of my party. I am for the most part the main meeler for our group. The party is mainly composed of spellcasters, who rarely enter the actual melee. Instead they either attack from a distance or from the air, which is a good idea. However when one of the spellcasters is in trouble, I usually try my best to aid them, unless I myself am being hard pressed at the time.That being the case, I rarely use my spring attack as much, since my tactic would be to stand in front of our enemies and try to prevent them from engaging with the spellcasters. I would have a hard time doing such a thing if I was always bouncing around the place.In addition, I also have a few rogue levels, which gives me a +2d6 sneak attack. However, I have few opportunities to get into a flanking position, since few party members are in actual melee.I am trying to decide if the increased rate of attack (by using dual-wielding) would balance out with the greater chance to hit (by using the greatsword with no penalties since I am not dual wielding.)</blockquote>