Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="swrushing" data-source="post: 1649001" data-attributes="member: 14140"></blockquote>Ok but if I dont have an arch nemesis, then i spend a game session sitting at home unmolested playing with the kids? Again, the difference between "in this scenario i fight a new villain" and "in this scenario i fight an old nemesis" is a matter mostly of flavor and style and whether its a personal thing or a new riddle to figure out. IMX that is not worth points. heck, if anything, my players prefer it to have the encounters be more personal, more of a tie in than a new thing or a "random menace". The relevence i see is quite simple. I have played hero a bit and it does make these sorts of things a part of the accounting, like you are suggesting MnM would. MNM doesn't currentlySo, and i may be off base here, but experience with games which ALREADY do what you are suggesting seems relevent.If its not to you, thats cool, but past experience to me seems a reasonable thing to consider.Ok, if you say so. Huh? This wasn't sarcastic!"Hindsight, much more accurate than foresight."Anyway, of course you don't have to convince me nor do i have to convince you. You posted them here, i presume, yo get people's opinions. you now have mine.enjoy.and, after you have put them in play and seen a number of games with them, how about popping back in to let us know your experiences? I myself find experience (hindsight) to be more helpful than expectation (foresight.)thanks.[/QUOTE]

Verification