Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HeavenShallBurn" data-source="post: 3449299" data-attributes="member: 39593">If this was done in the hypothetical 4e it would be an incentive to move many of the spells from various supplements to beef up the core, which would be a good thing.  So obviously they'd never do it that way and we'd suck up the loss of variety.Personally I'm used to the 1st-9th design and find it an easy and agreeable system.  I just want them to stop with the 9th/epic split and design proper 10th and above level play.  Using that system and extending from the normal wizard progression a wizard should have their first 10th level spell at 18th lvl and 2 at 20th lvl for a base progression.  That would make a nice rounded off system.</blockquote>