Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
2004 World Series
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guilt Puppy" data-source="post: 1818032" data-attributes="member: 6521"><p>You know, for all the talk about the Sox "giving the game away" and "squeaking by," at no point did the Cards have a lead. The only time the game was tied at the end of an inning (which is to say, tied after both teams had played equal outs) was the end of the sixth. Which is to say, that was the only time (aside from the start of the game) that the Red Sox didn't have the advantage -- if not a dominating performance, definitely a successful one.</p><p></p><p>Both teams made had their share of defensive misfortune, whether or not it could be scored an error. It was a windy night, a cold night, and if all of the slipping and sliding was any indication, it was a damp night as well. Both teams were playing with the fatigue of a hard-won seven-game LCS (the Cards had a slightly less deplenishing series, but then the Sox had an extra day of rest). With all that in mind, it makes perfect sense that the defense (in terms of pitching as well as fielding) should have had plenty of holes on both teams. Neither team really "screwed up," and neither team outperformed the circumstances. The game came down to hitting, and the Red Sox were able to dig out more big hits than the Cardinals were.</p><p></p><p>Really, I don't look at this game as anything but a good sign for the Sox. The miracle-play of the ALCS wasn't on the field tonight (okay, maybe in the batter's box), and they were still able to get this win.</p><p></p><p>Just three more to go.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guilt Puppy, post: 1818032, member: 6521"] You know, for all the talk about the Sox "giving the game away" and "squeaking by," at no point did the Cards have a lead. The only time the game was tied at the end of an inning (which is to say, tied after both teams had played equal outs) was the end of the sixth. Which is to say, that was the only time (aside from the start of the game) that the Red Sox didn't have the advantage -- if not a dominating performance, definitely a successful one. Both teams made had their share of defensive misfortune, whether or not it could be scored an error. It was a windy night, a cold night, and if all of the slipping and sliding was any indication, it was a damp night as well. Both teams were playing with the fatigue of a hard-won seven-game LCS (the Cards had a slightly less deplenishing series, but then the Sox had an extra day of rest). With all that in mind, it makes perfect sense that the defense (in terms of pitching as well as fielding) should have had plenty of holes on both teams. Neither team really "screwed up," and neither team outperformed the circumstances. The game came down to hitting, and the Red Sox were able to dig out more big hits than the Cardinals were. Really, I don't look at this game as anything but a good sign for the Sox. The miracle-play of the ALCS wasn't on the field tonight (okay, maybe in the batter's box), and they were still able to get this win. Just three more to go. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
2004 World Series
Top