Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
2007 ENnies Nominees - announced!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HalWhitewyrm" data-source="post: 3686778" data-attributes="member: 4046"><p>Denise, thanks a lot for clarifying what the actual reason for this bruhaha is. </p><p>I do have something to say, if only just to get it off my chest:</p><p></p><p>Frankly, I feel this is not reason enough and almost irrelevant because, according to the principle of "one person, one vote", the two votes cast by someone voting from work and from home, in the end, account for the two individuals living in the same household (a factual situation for more than half of the FTB staff). The ENnies do not require that a voter be a gamer or even knowledgeable of the nominees to cast a vote, reason enough to simply ask someone with the knowhow (i.e. a gamer spouse) to vote on their behalf, acting as a proxy. If I tell you that I voted twice, but also tell you that there are two individuals in my household, the principle of "one person, one vote" is still upheld.</p><p></p><p>Was this eventuality considered by the board before making their decision?</p><p></p><p>Now, if you tell me and it can be proven in some way that from a two-person household 3 votes were cast (or 2 votes from a single-person household), then yeah, absolutely, this is an obvious transgression.</p><p></p><p>I know that at this point this is a done deal, and I don't honestly expect the decisions of the board to be retracted, lest you then lose credibility for wavering, but as I said in a post over at the FTB boards, this event calls into question not only the entire voting process but also the votes for every other nominee in the awards. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I fully agree with this, and as I have said before, even if I feel that the case has been mishandled, at the end of the day I believe that the directors acted on their best intentions, and I do thank them for their largely-thankless work for the ENnies. I realize that as a result of this, the voting procedure will be evaluated and changed for future awards, which is a good step and one I welcome, as I also hope it will lead to further revisions of the rules of operation in order to avoid embarrasing issues like this one, for all involved, in the future.</p><p></p><p>I would also like to support the idea of setting a forum specifically for the ENnies at the award's website, so that conversations dealing specifically with the ENnies can be conducted in the proper venue, as opossed to spilling it over to EN World or other forums.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HalWhitewyrm, post: 3686778, member: 4046"] Denise, thanks a lot for clarifying what the actual reason for this bruhaha is. I do have something to say, if only just to get it off my chest: Frankly, I feel this is not reason enough and almost irrelevant because, according to the principle of "one person, one vote", the two votes cast by someone voting from work and from home, in the end, account for the two individuals living in the same household (a factual situation for more than half of the FTB staff). The ENnies do not require that a voter be a gamer or even knowledgeable of the nominees to cast a vote, reason enough to simply ask someone with the knowhow (i.e. a gamer spouse) to vote on their behalf, acting as a proxy. If I tell you that I voted twice, but also tell you that there are two individuals in my household, the principle of "one person, one vote" is still upheld. Was this eventuality considered by the board before making their decision? Now, if you tell me and it can be proven in some way that from a two-person household 3 votes were cast (or 2 votes from a single-person household), then yeah, absolutely, this is an obvious transgression. I know that at this point this is a done deal, and I don't honestly expect the decisions of the board to be retracted, lest you then lose credibility for wavering, but as I said in a post over at the FTB boards, this event calls into question not only the entire voting process but also the votes for every other nominee in the awards. I fully agree with this, and as I have said before, even if I feel that the case has been mishandled, at the end of the day I believe that the directors acted on their best intentions, and I do thank them for their largely-thankless work for the ENnies. I realize that as a result of this, the voting procedure will be evaluated and changed for future awards, which is a good step and one I welcome, as I also hope it will lead to further revisions of the rules of operation in order to avoid embarrasing issues like this one, for all involved, in the future. I would also like to support the idea of setting a forum specifically for the ENnies at the award's website, so that conversations dealing specifically with the ENnies can be conducted in the proper venue, as opossed to spilling it over to EN World or other forums. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
2007 ENnies Nominees - announced!
Top