Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
2007 Judge Selection
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rasyr" data-source="post: 3329039" data-attributes="member: 2855"><p>It can matter... It depends on the image that the ENnies wants to project. Image does not always follow reason...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I do not dislike any of the judges, nor do I dislike the ENnies. I think that there are some POTENTIAL problem areas and I would like to see them addressed publicly since these are supposed to be a fan-based awards, the fans SHOULD have the chance to give their input.</p><p></p><p>My questions for the judges (and thanks to P-kitty for answer the one about the Mods) are meant to specifically to elicit their opinions and thoughts on things that I think are important regarding the ENnies, as opposed to some of the silly questions asked. I assure you that I take the ENnies very seriously and have a great amount of respect for them. I just happen to think that they can be even better. And since I am not a stake-holder this year, I feel that I can fully and freely express my opinions in order to ask those in charge to make things better overall and fairer to all.</p><p></p><p>More questions for judges....</p><p></p><p>Do you think that a codified set of rules cannot include provisions for making changes and/or updating them as conditions and the market change?</p><p></p><p>Do you think it is wrong to have a basic set of rules be codified and put forth to let participant know exactly what points they will be judged on? Do make sure that each judge is judging the entrants on the same points?</p><p></p><p>(Note: granted each judge would put their own significance to each point, but at least they would all be covering the same points?)</p><p></p><p>Do you think that products entered in the main categories should be allowed to be included in other main categories by the judges?</p><p></p><p>Do you think that Categories should have at least a minimal description/standard to determine whether or not a product should be included in that category (i.e. that a book is required to be at least 50% about the setting to be considered for Best Setting)?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rasyr, post: 3329039, member: 2855"] It can matter... It depends on the image that the ENnies wants to project. Image does not always follow reason... I do not dislike any of the judges, nor do I dislike the ENnies. I think that there are some POTENTIAL problem areas and I would like to see them addressed publicly since these are supposed to be a fan-based awards, the fans SHOULD have the chance to give their input. My questions for the judges (and thanks to P-kitty for answer the one about the Mods) are meant to specifically to elicit their opinions and thoughts on things that I think are important regarding the ENnies, as opposed to some of the silly questions asked. I assure you that I take the ENnies very seriously and have a great amount of respect for them. I just happen to think that they can be even better. And since I am not a stake-holder this year, I feel that I can fully and freely express my opinions in order to ask those in charge to make things better overall and fairer to all. More questions for judges.... Do you think that a codified set of rules cannot include provisions for making changes and/or updating them as conditions and the market change? Do you think it is wrong to have a basic set of rules be codified and put forth to let participant know exactly what points they will be judged on? Do make sure that each judge is judging the entrants on the same points? (Note: granted each judge would put their own significance to each point, but at least they would all be covering the same points?) Do you think that products entered in the main categories should be allowed to be included in other main categories by the judges? Do you think that Categories should have at least a minimal description/standard to determine whether or not a product should be included in that category (i.e. that a book is required to be at least 50% about the setting to be considered for Best Setting)? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
2007 Judge Selection
Top