Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Master of the Game" data-source="post: 3339709" data-attributes="member: 9220">Sorry I'm running a little behind.  Started a new game this weekend, and I've been world-building <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />How do you personally evaluate flavor text?If it's easy to read, fits the game, highlights things that characters are actually capable of doing, and makes me want to play, it's good.How do you plan to evalute writing when applied to game mechanics?See above.  Seriously, if I can read it, it highlights what a character should be doing, and makes me want to play, then it's good whether it's crunch or fluff.When evaluating writing, how will you approach products with a very high percentage of mechanics compared to products with a very small percentage of game mechanics?It's all about what the game needs to get it's point across.  I love L5R, which has fluff and fiction scattered throughout the books, and I'm a huge fan of Shadowrun, whose supplements are like 90% fluff.  That said, I'm generally a rules guy, and very little makes me want to play a game more than interesting mechanics.  Some games just need less mechanics to get the job done.When evaluating writing, how will word count factor in? How will you compare a 20 page PDF to a 400+ hardcover book?Every product will be judged on it's own merits, not against other products.  If it's a great game, it doesn't matter how many pages it is.What is your opinion on materials produced for OOP games?Nothing but good for the community.  How many times have people wished new stuff would come out for their favorite system?How would you evaluate material for systems in which you have zero experience? What if any of those systems are highly complex? That is, the rulebooks are very dense and there may be many supplements. This can be the case for games with a long history, as in 15+ years.If possible, play them.  I'm not above sinking my own money into a core book if some supplement looks good enough to warrant it.  Barring that, discussion with players with a lot of experience with the core game.If you do not like a particular system, how will you evaluate supplements/adventures/whatever submitted for that system? Do you think there can be a good adventure for a bad system?Absolutely.  Every product has its own merits.  Rules should be judged for their quality.  Supplements should be judged for their utility, and adventures for how fun they are to play/ how much they inspire you.What barriers are you anticipating in play testing submissions? Are you thinking ahead to come up with contingencies?Obviously if there are hundreds of books, time will be a factor, as will availability of core books for systems I may not be familiar with.  Right now, my plan is to enlist my players into learning systems that I may not have time for, and to run games for me to play in.  That way I don't have to have GM level familiarity with everything.  As I mentioned above, I will also be looking to the communities surrounding the games in question for help in understanding the systems and what draws people to them.What do you consider your strong point(s) as a judge? Weak point(s)?Strong points:  Experience, time, and a voracious appetite for reading and learning new games.Weak Points:  I new to this thing, and will likely have to rely of some of the more experienced judges for advice.What one characteristic as a judge do you bring to the table that differentiates you from the other potential judges?I think most of the applicants will probably make for good judges, so I'd have to say what is likely to set me apart is sheer volume of time I can dedicate to reading and playtesting.  All I do at work (almost always) is work on stuff for my games.  I actually run two games in my office, in addition to the game I run at home, and spend three to four ten to twelve hour days sitting at my desk working on game stuff and world-building.What cultural interests do you have outside of gaming (i.e reading, comics, parenting, scuba diving, anything), that make you a better judge and why?Well, I read a lot, and do some comics (only three per month), and while I have gone scuba diving and danced competitively, I doubt they'll help me judge RPGs better <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  My reading and comics though do keep me up to date on genre conventions.How important a factor is artwork (cover, illustrations, cartography) in your overall impression of judging products? I'll admit to not being an art guy, so anything reasonable would probably work for me so long as it evokes the effect the game is going for.  The one exception would be art-intensive categories, in which case I'll have to rely on the opinions of a friend who is a professional artist.One thing that must be on everyone's mind this year is the possible submission of Ptolus. Answer either if you have read Ptolus or have seen enough of it to know the relative allotment of content--If Ptolus was entered, for what categories would you consider it eligible for nomination?I'll admit that I'm not familiar with Ptolus enough to answer.  My FLGS has it shrink-wrapped, and I don't own a copy.  I'd certainly love to give it a read though, and would be happy to answer for you afterwards <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Thanks for the great questions, they've made me put a lot more thought into this.I'd also like to add one more thing.  I'm not sure if it's allowed, but if possible, I'd like to maintain a blog detailing my progress going through entrants, and give people a chance to offer their opinions and advice as I'm reading them.</blockquote>

Verification