Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ferratus" data-source="post: 4823350" data-attributes="member: 55966">I think there is an opportunity to reboot Dragonlance back to the Chronicles, but take all the good ideas from the ongoing series and merge it all together with 4e principles.There have been so many new types of magic and story elements introduced that pretty much every 4e concept can be accommodated, and most of it can be woven together to work with the original six novels, and the historical novels (Elven and Dwarven Nations, Kingpriest Trilogy, Ergoth Trilogy, etc). The question is how much fidelity should be kept to the 1e conceits.&nbsp; In 3e for example, the 3.5 DL designers concluded that wielding only a staff or dagger was merely a custom of the Order of High Sorcery, because it got in the way of multi-classing and you needed a crossbow at low levels to keep from blowing all your spells.&nbsp; Similar compromises would have to be made in 4e</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ferratus, post: 4823350, member: 55966"] I think there is an opportunity to reboot Dragonlance back to the Chronicles, but take all the good ideas from the ongoing series and merge it all together with 4e principles. There have been so many new types of magic and story elements introduced that pretty much every 4e concept can be accommodated, and most of it can be woven together to work with the original six novels, and the historical novels (Elven and Dwarven Nations, Kingpriest Trilogy, Ergoth Trilogy, etc). The question is how much fidelity should be kept to the 1e conceits. In 3e for example, the 3.5 DL designers concluded that wielding only a staff or dagger was merely a custom of the Order of High Sorcery, because it got in the way of multi-classing and you needed a crossbow at low levels to keep from blowing all your spells. Similar compromises would have to be made in 4e [/QUOTE]

Verification