Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="doctorhook" data-source="post: 4823781" data-attributes="member: 58401">Everything I've heard about DL suggests that its roots really were a lot stronger than many of the more recent developments. With that in mind, a 4E version of Dragonlance will be the first version of it that I explore, and so I naturally hope for it to be interesting; thus, I think I'd like to see 4E's Dragonlance focus upon whatever parts originally made it great, balanced with the basic assumptions of 4E (the world-axis metacosmology, many types of magic, the existance of &quot;monstrous&quot; player races, etc.).What irks me is when certain individuals who are openly hostile to 4E make pejorative comments towards either that system or WotC for publishing it. I happen to like 3.5E, but I like 4E even more, and I'm generally quite happy with how WotC handles things. I resent when these individuals antagonize my choice of game, or suggest that a 4E version of given setting (say, for example, Dragonlance) would inherently be inferior on account of merely being 4E or published by WotC. I happen to think they mostly do a great job.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="doctorhook, post: 4823781, member: 58401"] Everything I've heard about DL suggests that its roots really were a lot stronger than many of the more recent developments. With that in mind, a 4E version of Dragonlance will be the first version of it that I explore, and so I naturally hope for it to be interesting; thus, I think I'd like to see 4E's Dragonlance focus upon whatever parts originally made it great, balanced with the basic assumptions of 4E (the world-axis metacosmology, many types of magic, the existance of "monstrous" player races, etc.). What irks me is when certain individuals who are openly hostile to 4E make pejorative comments towards either that system or WotC for publishing it. I happen to like 3.5E, but I like 4E even more, and I'm generally quite happy with how WotC handles things. I resent when these individuals antagonize my choice of game, or suggest that a 4E version of given setting (say, for example, Dragonlance) would inherently be inferior on account of merely being 4E or published by WotC. I happen to think they mostly do a great job. [/QUOTE]

Verification