Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dragonhelm" data-source="post: 4823916" data-attributes="member: 3867">You're absolutely right, the main focus of Dragonlance has always been the War of the Lance.&nbsp; This begs the question of whether they will go back to this era, or create a new starting point like they did with the Realms.&nbsp; Hard to say, though I'd guess they'd go with the WotL era due to the popularity of Chronicles and Legends.I hope none of my comments have been misconstrued as anti-4e or anti-WotC.&nbsp; If so, then I apologize if I have inadvertently given that impression.Like you, I like 3.5e, but I like 4e even more.&nbsp; I am also a fan of WotC.&nbsp; Nothing against them.&nbsp; I've enjoyed the 4e products quite a bit.&nbsp; That being said, I'm also one of the freelance writers for MWP who helped to shape and mold Dragonlance for 3.5, as well as the administrator for the Dragonlance Nexus fan website.&nbsp; I've been a Dragonlance fan since the early 90s.&nbsp; So the setting is very near and dear to my heart.When I look at 4e for Dragonlance, I know that WotC would put out a good product.&nbsp; Yet I also have certain misgivings, based largely on the Realms reboot.&nbsp; I also have questions about certain items, like how to do gully dwarves when there are no negative ability score modifiers.While WotC may do a good job, MWP would be better still (in my opinion).&nbsp; The reason I say this is because MWP and their freelances are vested in the setting.&nbsp; They know the setting inside out, and worked hard to integrate 3.5-isms into the setting.&nbsp; The MWP era of Dragonlance gaming is considered by many fans to be the &quot;golden age of Dragonlance gaming.&quot;&nbsp; So that's where I'm coming from on this.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dragonhelm, post: 4823916, member: 3867"] You're absolutely right, the main focus of Dragonlance has always been the War of the Lance. This begs the question of whether they will go back to this era, or create a new starting point like they did with the Realms. Hard to say, though I'd guess they'd go with the WotL era due to the popularity of Chronicles and Legends. I hope none of my comments have been misconstrued as anti-4e or anti-WotC. If so, then I apologize if I have inadvertently given that impression. Like you, I like 3.5e, but I like 4e even more. I am also a fan of WotC. Nothing against them. I've enjoyed the 4e products quite a bit. That being said, I'm also one of the freelance writers for MWP who helped to shape and mold Dragonlance for 3.5, as well as the administrator for the Dragonlance Nexus fan website. I've been a Dragonlance fan since the early 90s. So the setting is very near and dear to my heart. When I look at 4e for Dragonlance, I know that WotC would put out a good product. Yet I also have certain misgivings, based largely on the Realms reboot. I also have questions about certain items, like how to do gully dwarves when there are no negative ability score modifiers. While WotC may do a good job, MWP would be better still (in my opinion). The reason I say this is because MWP and their freelances are vested in the setting. They know the setting inside out, and worked hard to integrate 3.5-isms into the setting. The MWP era of Dragonlance gaming is considered by many fans to be the "golden age of Dragonlance gaming." So that's where I'm coming from on this. [/QUOTE]

Verification