Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Levistus's_Leviathan" data-source="post: 7987426" data-attributes="member: 7023887">I'd argue that the fact that they're doing these psioinic options show that they're trying to bring it back, and allow them to bring back Dark Sun. That's what they did with the Artificer, they didn't bring back Eberron until they had a working Artificer class. They're testing out a new Psionics system in recent Unearthed Arcana, so that makes me suspect that they want to bring Dark Sun back. Dark Sun is an old setting that if brought to 5e would bring something new to the edition. Here are some examples of old settings:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Dragonlance, doesn't bring anything new that can't already be represented with the current ruleset. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Greyhawk, again doesn't bring anything new that needs a new book for.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Mystara, doesn't bring much that is new, certainly not enough to fill a book with besides setting lore. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Planescape, not much mechanical differences through the editions, we would need a book filled with more information on the planes and maps. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Spelljammer, would need a whole book and overhaul of how it works to work in 5e. Eberron, Wildemount, Ravnica, Theros, none of those settings have crystal spheres, so if they'd want to include those settings in Spelljammer, there'd have to be a massive overhaul. </li> </ul>There aren't many things popular settings from older editions have that can't easily be brought to 5e. Most of them that do need books to replicate them in 5e (spelljammer, planescape, dark sun) already have some information on how to work and just need some revisions to be brought properly to this edition.</blockquote>

Verification