Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lord Twig" data-source="post: 9593322" data-attributes="member: 31754">But you can still miss with a greataxe, or a maul, or a halberd. How come they can miss but the greatsword can't?And I don't want the solution to be for them all not to miss!I'll say it again. Just because I (and obviously others) don't like Graze, or the &quot;Damage on a Miss&quot; mechanic in general, doesn't mean that it is objectively bad. It is a matter of preference. Trying to argue and rationalize &quot;No, really! It makes sense!&quot; Isn't going to help. I understand that you can come up with a reason for it, but it doesn't change the fact I don't like it.Maybe we can talk about some of the good things that came out of 4e that are in the new rules. I like the Bloodied mechanic. I don’t think everything from 4e is bad.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lord Twig, post: 9593322, member: 31754"] But you can still miss with a greataxe, or a maul, or a halberd. How come they can miss but the greatsword can't? And I don't want the solution to be for them all not to miss! I'll say it again. Just because I (and obviously others) don't like Graze, or the "Damage on a Miss" mechanic in general, doesn't mean that it is objectively bad. It is a matter of preference. Trying to argue and rationalize "No, really! It makes sense!" Isn't going to help. I understand that you can come up with a reason for it, but it doesn't change the fact I don't like it. Maybe we can talk about some of the good things that came out of 4e that are in the new rules. I like the Bloodied mechanic. I don’t think everything from 4e is bad.:) [/QUOTE]

Verification