Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lord Twig" data-source="post: 9602056" data-attributes="member: 31754">Thank you for the thoughful response. Up to here I was just going to give a thumbs up to your post and leave it there, but I feel I should address your points below.I didn't say this at all. No where did I suggest you are an awful person or that your arguments aren't worth listening to. I did feel that you were more focused on tearing down the current version of D&amp;D instead of just comparing it to 4e, but you say that is not your intention and I will take you at your word.Maybe I just haven't been able to read enough to get where you were coming from. I could easily deduce that you were a big 4e fan, and that is fine. However I was not aware of your position as a &quot;well known critic of 5e&quot; until your post that I replied to. So I guess that is on me for implying you were trying to hide it. So I apologize for that.Of course a thread that mentioned 4e specifically would draw your attention, and of course you are free to say whatever you want (within the bounds of the forum rules of course). I did not say that you shouldn't be allowed to talk about it, I just wondered why you bothered. You answered quite elegantly above. I was genuinely curious, as I said in my post, and you answered. So thank you for that.I don't really have enough time to follow all of the threads I am interested and read all of the posts. But, apparently like you, this is one of the few places I can talk about my favorite hobby, so I sometimes I have to skip posts to catch up to the lastest discussion. So I will also apologize if I have missed something that was already covered.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lord Twig, post: 9602056, member: 31754"] Thank you for the thoughful response. Up to here I was just going to give a thumbs up to your post and leave it there, but I feel I should address your points below. I didn't say this at all. No where did I suggest you are an awful person or that your arguments aren't worth listening to. I did feel that you were more focused on tearing down the current version of D&D instead of just comparing it to 4e, but you say that is not your intention and I will take you at your word. Maybe I just haven't been able to read enough to get where you were coming from. I could easily deduce that you were a big 4e fan, and that is fine. However I was not aware of your position as a "well known critic of 5e" until your post that I replied to. So I guess that is on me for implying you were trying to hide it. So I apologize for that. Of course a thread that mentioned 4e specifically would draw your attention, and of course you are free to say whatever you want (within the bounds of the forum rules of course). I did not say that you shouldn't be allowed to talk about it, I just wondered why you bothered. You answered quite elegantly above. I was genuinely curious, as I said in my post, and you answered. So thank you for that. I don't really have enough time to follow all of the threads I am interested and read all of the posts. But, apparently like you, this is one of the few places I can talk about my favorite hobby, so I sometimes I have to skip posts to catch up to the lastest discussion. So I will also apologize if I have missed something that was already covered. [/QUOTE]

Verification