Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2024 needs to end 2014's passive aggressive efforts to remove magic items & other elements from d&d
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 9216427" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>They did not. It was just quoted from XGTE that they said outright magic items are expected to be in the game. "The D&D game is built on the assumption that magic items appear sporadically and that they are always a boon." That's exactly what I've said all along - the designers expect they will be there, but because their distribution and quantity is random based on tables, they didn't design the math around them because they'd have no way to judge what the math needs to accommodate. But they absolutely acknowledge magic items will 1) be in your game, and 2) their appearance will be sporadic, and 3) they will be a benefit to the party.</p><p></p><p>It then ALSO tells those players, "Magic items can go from nice to necessary in the rare group that has no spellcasters, no monk, and no PCs capable of casting magic weapon. Having no magic makes it extremely difficult for a party to overcome monsters that have resistances or immunity to nonmagical damage. In such a game, you'll want to be generous with magic weapons or else avoid using such monsters." So your claim WOTC never tells people the game changes meaningfully if they have no spellcasters AND no magic items is false - they do tell them.</p><p></p><p>AND the new version of the game appears to have removed resistance or immunity to non-magical weapons. So any issue which could have arisen from that part of the issue was already resolved.</p><p></p><p>New players and DMs have no reason to go into the game thinking a total lack of both spellcasters and magic items is the norm or expected to function well without adjustment. At no point does the game suggest to players or DMs this is how the game functions. Nor is there any meaningful number of players complaining, over a decade period of time, that they do this and the game crashes for them. It's just not a common problem. It's not something which must be solved. It was a hypothetical issue which never arose. People who want to do that either play another game, like the 5e version of Lord of the Rings which intentionally adjusts 5e to accommodate those assumptions, or another game, or they adjust 5e to work for them - either through differing player tactics, or a DM adjusting challenges. And there's no great number of people out there saying this is some issue which is in need of fixing.</p><p></p><p>Now that we've definitively established that, and I said I was asking for the last time for the evidence you never produced, I guess we're done here?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 9216427, member: 2525"] They did not. It was just quoted from XGTE that they said outright magic items are expected to be in the game. "The D&D game is built on the assumption that magic items appear sporadically and that they are always a boon." That's exactly what I've said all along - the designers expect they will be there, but because their distribution and quantity is random based on tables, they didn't design the math around them because they'd have no way to judge what the math needs to accommodate. But they absolutely acknowledge magic items will 1) be in your game, and 2) their appearance will be sporadic, and 3) they will be a benefit to the party. It then ALSO tells those players, "Magic items can go from nice to necessary in the rare group that has no spellcasters, no monk, and no PCs capable of casting magic weapon. Having no magic makes it extremely difficult for a party to overcome monsters that have resistances or immunity to nonmagical damage. In such a game, you'll want to be generous with magic weapons or else avoid using such monsters." So your claim WOTC never tells people the game changes meaningfully if they have no spellcasters AND no magic items is false - they do tell them. AND the new version of the game appears to have removed resistance or immunity to non-magical weapons. So any issue which could have arisen from that part of the issue was already resolved. New players and DMs have no reason to go into the game thinking a total lack of both spellcasters and magic items is the norm or expected to function well without adjustment. At no point does the game suggest to players or DMs this is how the game functions. Nor is there any meaningful number of players complaining, over a decade period of time, that they do this and the game crashes for them. It's just not a common problem. It's not something which must be solved. It was a hypothetical issue which never arose. People who want to do that either play another game, like the 5e version of Lord of the Rings which intentionally adjusts 5e to accommodate those assumptions, or another game, or they adjust 5e to work for them - either through differing player tactics, or a DM adjusting challenges. And there's no great number of people out there saying this is some issue which is in need of fixing. Now that we've definitively established that, and I said I was asking for the last time for the evidence you never produced, I guess we're done here? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2024 needs to end 2014's passive aggressive efforts to remove magic items & other elements from d&d
Top