Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 9217677" data-attributes="member: 12731">I don't understand what you're trying to say, except if you're trying to say &quot;players are never going to be content with anything less than unrestricted item use&quot;.Limits not only hold back imbalance, they're what makes charbuilding interesting.Of course there's going to be a limit. I'm not giving anyone any illusions of having what they want. If you went &quot;oh I get 10 attunement slots&quot;, didn't read the rest of the proposed rule, and immediately went &quot;that's ten robes of the archmagi, sweet!&quot; that's on you.I am increasing the flexibility so that the choice between a more powerful item (with attunement) and a less powerful one (still with attunement) becomes actually interesting.But it wasn't a carefully constructed proposal. It was an on the cuff idea to illustrate that maybe it would be best to let the body slot idea go; that other solutions can exist.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 9217677, member: 12731"] I don't understand what you're trying to say, except if you're trying to say "players are never going to be content with anything less than unrestricted item use". Limits not only hold back imbalance, they're what makes charbuilding interesting. Of course there's going to be a limit. I'm not giving anyone any illusions of having what they want. If you went "oh I get 10 attunement slots", didn't read the rest of the proposed rule, and immediately went "that's ten robes of the archmagi, sweet!" that's on you. I am increasing the flexibility so that the choice between a more powerful item (with attunement) and a less powerful one (still with attunement) becomes actually interesting. But it wasn't a carefully constructed proposal. It was an on the cuff idea to illustrate that maybe it would be best to let the body slot idea go; that other solutions can exist. [/QUOTE]

Verification