Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2024 Player's Handbook preview: "New Spells"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9392723" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>You keep saying that Shield should only be available for the builds it was created for... but those are exactly the builds I'm talking about. Bladesingers are WIZARDS. Shield was designed for WIZARDS. So Shield is being used exactly for who it was created for in that instance. Eldritch Knights in 2014 were limited to abjuration and evocation spells. Shield is a level 1 Abjuration spell. In the 2014 PHB it is one of only four 1st level Abjuration spells. The others being Mage Armor (clearly not something the Eldritch Knight was supposed to take), Alarm and Protection from Good and Evil. Clearly they were meant to use Shield.</p><p></p><p>So... I'm confused. Should we rewrite the Bladesinger to say that it is the only Wizard who is forbidden from casting Shield? Should the Eldritch Knight have never been giving Abjuration spells? How are we supposed to limit the spell to "only those it was created for" when it is clear the Bladesinger and Eldritch Knight were designed to have access to it? </p><p></p><p>The thing I'm arguing is that... I think people are exaggerating the problem. Whether it is because they only have two combats in a day and so the Eldritch Knight is able to shield every single attack that would land against them, or because they prefer to exclusively use monsters that make attack rolls instead of saves, I don't know. But people keep claiming "an AC of 27 for 1 round was never intended!!" while I'm looking at the actual initial designs and thinking... actually it was. Unless you think the Bladesinger was designed with the designers never once thinking a wizard would take mage armor and shield, two classic and iconic wizard spells, or that they didn't realize Shield was an abjuration spell when they gave those spells to the Eldritch Knight. </p><p></p><p>And at the end of the day, if a heavily armored magical knight is able to spend 1 round being unhittable... that's exactly what the player was building their character to accomplish. They achieved their goal, that is a good thing. And if you desperately need to cause hp damage to them despite that... use a saving throw. But a tank successfully styming attacks against them is the build working as intended.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9392723, member: 6801228"] You keep saying that Shield should only be available for the builds it was created for... but those are exactly the builds I'm talking about. Bladesingers are WIZARDS. Shield was designed for WIZARDS. So Shield is being used exactly for who it was created for in that instance. Eldritch Knights in 2014 were limited to abjuration and evocation spells. Shield is a level 1 Abjuration spell. In the 2014 PHB it is one of only four 1st level Abjuration spells. The others being Mage Armor (clearly not something the Eldritch Knight was supposed to take), Alarm and Protection from Good and Evil. Clearly they were meant to use Shield. So... I'm confused. Should we rewrite the Bladesinger to say that it is the only Wizard who is forbidden from casting Shield? Should the Eldritch Knight have never been giving Abjuration spells? How are we supposed to limit the spell to "only those it was created for" when it is clear the Bladesinger and Eldritch Knight were designed to have access to it? The thing I'm arguing is that... I think people are exaggerating the problem. Whether it is because they only have two combats in a day and so the Eldritch Knight is able to shield every single attack that would land against them, or because they prefer to exclusively use monsters that make attack rolls instead of saves, I don't know. But people keep claiming "an AC of 27 for 1 round was never intended!!" while I'm looking at the actual initial designs and thinking... actually it was. Unless you think the Bladesinger was designed with the designers never once thinking a wizard would take mage armor and shield, two classic and iconic wizard spells, or that they didn't realize Shield was an abjuration spell when they gave those spells to the Eldritch Knight. And at the end of the day, if a heavily armored magical knight is able to spend 1 round being unhittable... that's exactly what the player was building their character to accomplish. They achieved their goal, that is a good thing. And if you desperately need to cause hp damage to them despite that... use a saving throw. But a tank successfully styming attacks against them is the build working as intended. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2024 Player's Handbook preview: "New Spells"
Top