Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nadan" data-source="post: 9383448" data-attributes="member: 6875138">Sorry but I fail to understand what is your logic here. First, the good old 14 soc /6 pal build already better at smiting than pure paladin (you can even argue being a better sorcerer).Second, in term of action economy, now the new smites require a BA so bards is out cause they are BA heavy class especially valor and dance; moon druid still can't cast while wildshape unless very high level; cleric can't chop twice and kinda BA heavy already; blade lock have their own smite (which also need some tweak tbh); due to new smites technically is BA spell socerers no longer able to attack-smite then quicken spells out; wizards don't do chopping in general. And now since you can only smite once per round your slots will buring relative slow so full caster's advantage (more slot to smite) is less significant.Third, the new zealot barbarian has more divine fury and paladin-lit flavor on their mechanism and don't require dying now, you should give them a try.</blockquote>