Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2024 Player's Handbook Reveal: Feats/Backgrounds/Species
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iosue" data-source="post: 9383288" data-attributes="member: 6680772"><p>I initially viewed the introduction of Feats into backgrounds with dismay, as I very much liked that Feats were opt-in in the 2014 rules. I don't like Feats, and I did like how simple character generation was in 2014. It felt like a step back to the super-involved chargen of 3e and 4e.</p><p></p><p>I am somewhat mollified to hear in the video that pure ASIs are still included in the game, so that you can opt-out of Feats as part of character advancement if you want to. They just wanted to beef up the backgrounds with mechanical weight instead of the more nebulous ribbons of 2014 Backgrounds. And I can live with that.</p><p></p><p>In the Gen Con TV retrospective on 5e, Mike Mearls made a very astute observation that I think needs to be considered when looking at their decisions for the 2024 PHB. And that was, while its said that most players only buy PHBs, in actuality the vast majority of players don't buy <em>anything</em>. The show up for a game, borrow someone's PHB to make a character, and that's it.</p><p></p><p>Everything I've seen about the PHB indicates that, while we who buy all the core books and lovingly pour over each page will still get all that we want and need, the design seems very much geared towards those who won't own the books, but rather will be making only periodic reference to it at the table. The Rules Glossary is one example of this. The Character Class and Subclass summary page is another. And I think moving the Custom Background rules to the DMG is yet another.</p><p></p><p>For regular players, Custom Backgrounds are virtually a <em>fait accompli</em>, but for a new or casual player, devoting the PHB's limited space to only the provided Backgrounds makes things clearer and more straightforward. And not only would making a Custom Background generally have to involve the DM anyway, but creating Custom Backgrounds for one's own homebrew is also something DMs will likely like to do. Seen from that lens, rather than the Player vs. DM power dynamics that are a favorite topic of forums like this, putting Custom Backgrounds in the DMG make eminent sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iosue, post: 9383288, member: 6680772"] I initially viewed the introduction of Feats into backgrounds with dismay, as I very much liked that Feats were opt-in in the 2014 rules. I don't like Feats, and I did like how simple character generation was in 2014. It felt like a step back to the super-involved chargen of 3e and 4e. I am somewhat mollified to hear in the video that pure ASIs are still included in the game, so that you can opt-out of Feats as part of character advancement if you want to. They just wanted to beef up the backgrounds with mechanical weight instead of the more nebulous ribbons of 2014 Backgrounds. And I can live with that. In the Gen Con TV retrospective on 5e, Mike Mearls made a very astute observation that I think needs to be considered when looking at their decisions for the 2024 PHB. And that was, while its said that most players only buy PHBs, in actuality the vast majority of players don't buy [I]anything[/I]. The show up for a game, borrow someone's PHB to make a character, and that's it. Everything I've seen about the PHB indicates that, while we who buy all the core books and lovingly pour over each page will still get all that we want and need, the design seems very much geared towards those who won't own the books, but rather will be making only periodic reference to it at the table. The Rules Glossary is one example of this. The Character Class and Subclass summary page is another. And I think moving the Custom Background rules to the DMG is yet another. For regular players, Custom Backgrounds are virtually a [I]fait accompli[/I], but for a new or casual player, devoting the PHB's limited space to only the provided Backgrounds makes things clearer and more straightforward. And not only would making a Custom Background generally have to involve the DM anyway, but creating Custom Backgrounds for one's own homebrew is also something DMs will likely like to do. Seen from that lens, rather than the Player vs. DM power dynamics that are a favorite topic of forums like this, putting Custom Backgrounds in the DMG make eminent sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2024 Player's Handbook Reveal: Feats/Backgrounds/Species
Top