Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2024 Player's Handbook Reveal: Feats/Backgrounds/Species
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9386940" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Would you accept that, since it is very group dependent, very much like an extreme flex in a video game where you are purposefully making things harder on yourself... that the base game should instead cater more to the group that wants a normal, non-honor mode experience? </p><p></p><p>Like, if you want to play that way, you can play that way. IF a player came to me and said "I want to roll a 1d12 for each of my stats so I have all low numbers"... well, I'd tell them I think it is a bad idea, and that the party might get frustrated with them if they can't contribute, but I wouldn't stop them. You are free to choose that style if you want. </p><p></p><p>But the opposite rarely seems to be true. If I want to play a merchant fighter who starts with a 16 strength and a 16 constitution, despite the fact that the merchant background only allows INT, Cha, and Wis bonuses... that isn't being respected. I'm being told I am wrong, that I'm just a power-gamer, that I'm obsessed with the number 16, that I'm whining instead of accepting that my choices have consequences. </p><p></p><p>No one has ever stated that you can't choose to have low stats. All that has ever been said is that the rest of us don't want that. Play DnD on Extreme Honor Mode if that is your bliss. But let us play the way we want to as well. Stop looking down on us because we are frustrated that our character concepts keep getting limited by mechanics we don't really need.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9386940, member: 6801228"] Would you accept that, since it is very group dependent, very much like an extreme flex in a video game where you are purposefully making things harder on yourself... that the base game should instead cater more to the group that wants a normal, non-honor mode experience? Like, if you want to play that way, you can play that way. IF a player came to me and said "I want to roll a 1d12 for each of my stats so I have all low numbers"... well, I'd tell them I think it is a bad idea, and that the party might get frustrated with them if they can't contribute, but I wouldn't stop them. You are free to choose that style if you want. But the opposite rarely seems to be true. If I want to play a merchant fighter who starts with a 16 strength and a 16 constitution, despite the fact that the merchant background only allows INT, Cha, and Wis bonuses... that isn't being respected. I'm being told I am wrong, that I'm just a power-gamer, that I'm obsessed with the number 16, that I'm whining instead of accepting that my choices have consequences. No one has ever stated that you can't choose to have low stats. All that has ever been said is that the rest of us don't want that. Play DnD on Extreme Honor Mode if that is your bliss. But let us play the way we want to as well. Stop looking down on us because we are frustrated that our character concepts keep getting limited by mechanics we don't really need. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2024 Player's Handbook Reveal: Feats/Backgrounds/Species
Top