Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9398070" data-attributes="member: 6801228">Well, you were incredibly vague on what you think that versatility should be. Should rangers be the pet class? They have a subclass for that. Should they deal with the Fey? They have a subclass for that. Hunter of monsters? SubclassStalker of the Shadows? SubclassShould they be survivalists? They are. Should they epitomize traveling? They do. Just about the only thing I can see the ranger not covering is crafting items... which is now a new subsystem in the PHB and so that should be covered too. So your ranger can gather herbs in the forest and make healing poultices and poisons.Rangers, as written, actually can cover a massive range of concepts. And yes, some of those concepts are currently covered by spells. You want a Ranger that can speak with animals? Just like the Druid you need a spell for that. So... where is the lack that specifically needs a non-magical ability added to the class to cover it?</blockquote>