Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CleverNickName" data-source="post: 8752737" data-attributes="member: 50987">Honestly?&nbsp; I like it.&nbsp; It's very similar to the <a href="http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/sorcerer:storm-sorcery#:~:text=Tempestuous%20Magic,feet%20without%20provoking%20opportunity%20attacks." target="_blank">Tempestuous Magic ability for the Storm Sorcerer</a>, except:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">the movement equals your walking speed (instead of 10 feet),</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">but it costs an Action (instead of a Bonus action, as part of another spell)</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">and still provokes Opportunity attacks (unlike the Storm Sorcerer.)</li>
</ul>It's a fancy Dash action.&nbsp; I'd allow it at my table.<img src="https://media4.giphy.com/media/NCjISbEPFxm48/200.gif" alt="Ill Allow It Spanish GIF" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" />The only change I would make (and only if this cantrip was causing problems) would be to remove the &quot;At Higher Levels&quot; section.&nbsp; And if it were still causing problems, somehow, I'd add a sentence like &quot;If you are still aloft at the end of the spell's duration, you fall.&quot;&nbsp; But I don't think I'd have any issues with it as-written; giving up an Action in exchange for movement--even &quot;fancy&quot; movement--isn't very appealing to my players.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CleverNickName, post: 8752737, member: 50987"] Honestly? I like it. It's very similar to the [URL='http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/sorcerer:storm-sorcery#:~:text=Tempestuous%20Magic,feet%20without%20provoking%20opportunity%20attacks.'][B]Tempestuous Magic ability for the Storm Sorcerer[/B][/URL], except: [LIST] [*]the movement equals your walking speed (instead of 10 feet), [*]but it costs an Action (instead of a Bonus action, as part of another spell) [*]and still provokes Opportunity attacks (unlike the Storm Sorcerer.) [/LIST] It's a fancy Dash action. I'd allow it at my table. [IMG alt="Ill Allow It Spanish GIF"]https://media4.giphy.com/media/NCjISbEPFxm48/200.gif[/IMG] The only change I would make (and only if this cantrip was causing problems) would be to remove the "At Higher Levels" section. And if it were [I]still [/I]causing problems, somehow, I'd add a sentence like "If you are still aloft at the end of the spell's duration, you fall." But I don't think I'd have any issues with it as-written; giving up an Action in exchange for movement--even "fancy" movement--isn't very appealing to my players. [/QUOTE]

Verification