Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2025 Monster Manual to Introduce Male Versions of Hags, Medusas, and Dryads
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9551431" data-attributes="member: 42856"><p>I don't see this pictorial choice as particularly inclusive. It's marginal as best.</p><p></p><p>Having a few benevolent creatures be female (like satyresses) despite already having an established benevolent female counterpart in myth (the nymphs) doesn't help, the female version was already present. And honestly, the nymph was certainly depicted more postively than the satyr, even though D&D official art fell short of representing satyrs with their namesake oversized, excited genital organs.</p><p></p><p>Having a single evil monsters (Hags) being shown as male is a really slight gain (it's still a monster that is the reflection on prejudice against age and ugliness).</p><p></p><p>Having a poor, cursed creature who can't help but petrifying any social contact it may have (Medusa) be either male of female is certainly more inclusive, as in "every sex can get cursed", but I wouldn't use that as a badge of inclusivity. Especially when it's not new, male medusa have been part of the game since 3e (Sharn City of Towers, 2004) and apparently already had a male counterpart (the maedar, of whom I learnt in this thread).</p><p></p><p>Having a few benevolent creatures (nymphs, dryads) be male doesn't seem to do much for inclusivity. Sure, making this creature sexed (before, one could say that it was a single-sex species, therefore neutral as they weren't known to breed) gives more visibility to males in the game, but I don't feel we lacked cool depictions of male creatures in the game at this point. If they wanted to do more for inclusivity on this front of male representation, they'd depict more female orcs and goblins in published content: I am pretty sure a lot of groups imagine all male when they are told "the peaceful caravan is ambushed by 6 goblin warriors". As an example, the goblin tribe described in Rime of the Frostmaiden has exactly 1 female goblin, and she's a healer. There are several children goblins, so it's not just the author wanting to avoid a slaughter of civilians...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jfdlsjfd, post: 9551431, member: 42856"] I don't see this pictorial choice as particularly inclusive. It's marginal as best. Having a few benevolent creatures be female (like satyresses) despite already having an established benevolent female counterpart in myth (the nymphs) doesn't help, the female version was already present. And honestly, the nymph was certainly depicted more postively than the satyr, even though D&D official art fell short of representing satyrs with their namesake oversized, excited genital organs. Having a single evil monsters (Hags) being shown as male is a really slight gain (it's still a monster that is the reflection on prejudice against age and ugliness). Having a poor, cursed creature who can't help but petrifying any social contact it may have (Medusa) be either male of female is certainly more inclusive, as in "every sex can get cursed", but I wouldn't use that as a badge of inclusivity. Especially when it's not new, male medusa have been part of the game since 3e (Sharn City of Towers, 2004) and apparently already had a male counterpart (the maedar, of whom I learnt in this thread). Having a few benevolent creatures (nymphs, dryads) be male doesn't seem to do much for inclusivity. Sure, making this creature sexed (before, one could say that it was a single-sex species, therefore neutral as they weren't known to breed) gives more visibility to males in the game, but I don't feel we lacked cool depictions of male creatures in the game at this point. If they wanted to do more for inclusivity on this front of male representation, they'd depict more female orcs and goblins in published content: I am pretty sure a lot of groups imagine all male when they are told "the peaceful caravan is ambushed by 6 goblin warriors". As an example, the goblin tribe described in Rime of the Frostmaiden has exactly 1 female goblin, and she's a healer. There are several children goblins, so it's not just the author wanting to avoid a slaughter of civilians... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2025 Monster Manual to Introduce Male Versions of Hags, Medusas, and Dryads
Top