Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2025 Monster Manual to Introduce Male Versions of Hags, Medusas, and Dryads
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9552699" data-attributes="member: 42856"><p>I've been bothered ever since. Like I said earlier, it's just "eye-rolling silly" not something that would make me proclaim my hat of d02. It's as silly as stabbing oneself in the eye with a dagger every evening before going to sleep, saying at worst I'll lose 10 HP, I'll be fine next morning D&Dism. I live with it, despite it being silly. Same with hearing about encountering 1d6+1 medusas or encountering a serpent-bodied medusa (I've never, but apparently I should expect that if I were to play with a random group).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're replying to me, not him. I don't support the opinion of a random Youtuber in a video I've never seen. The only mention of sex was the silliness of female satyrs, since we already had nymphs and if you want pairs, you can call them Fauns. It would be also justified because another poster mentionned in the thread that it didn't want to see satyrs with giant erect male organs and brutal mating practices... Which are associated with satyrs but not fauns. Satyrs embody sexual energy and it's probably an association WotC would want to avoid for marketing purpose. Fauns are much closer to the "spirits of merriment" they're described as in D&D.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, you were replying to me, and the accusation of double standards was because I was pretendedly not bothered by Golems being plural in lore, not bothered by vampire being female in lore, and bothered by medusas. As your two claims are found to be incorrect, this accusation of me having double standards falls.</p><p></p><p>Then you goes on a strange and insulting tangeant about either of these monsters being sexy influencing my choice as if I had some kink. It is coming out of nowhere and extremely offensive. I have no interest to interact with you any longer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jfdlsjfd, post: 9552699, member: 42856"] I've been bothered ever since. Like I said earlier, it's just "eye-rolling silly" not something that would make me proclaim my hat of d02. It's as silly as stabbing oneself in the eye with a dagger every evening before going to sleep, saying at worst I'll lose 10 HP, I'll be fine next morning D&Dism. I live with it, despite it being silly. Same with hearing about encountering 1d6+1 medusas or encountering a serpent-bodied medusa (I've never, but apparently I should expect that if I were to play with a random group). You're replying to me, not him. I don't support the opinion of a random Youtuber in a video I've never seen. The only mention of sex was the silliness of female satyrs, since we already had nymphs and if you want pairs, you can call them Fauns. It would be also justified because another poster mentionned in the thread that it didn't want to see satyrs with giant erect male organs and brutal mating practices... Which are associated with satyrs but not fauns. Satyrs embody sexual energy and it's probably an association WotC would want to avoid for marketing purpose. Fauns are much closer to the "spirits of merriment" they're described as in D&D. Well, you were replying to me, and the accusation of double standards was because I was pretendedly not bothered by Golems being plural in lore, not bothered by vampire being female in lore, and bothered by medusas. As your two claims are found to be incorrect, this accusation of me having double standards falls. Then you goes on a strange and insulting tangeant about either of these monsters being sexy influencing my choice as if I had some kink. It is coming out of nowhere and extremely offensive. I have no interest to interact with you any longer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2025 Monster Manual to Introduce Male Versions of Hags, Medusas, and Dryads
Top
