Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
2d10 rather than d20?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Johnny Angel" data-source="post: 1032595" data-attributes="member: 13334"><p>On the one hand, I like it. One thing I've always liked about GURPS was how the skills basically represented a shift in the bell curve.</p><p></p><p>The difference it makes in a system designed on a linear probability curve is probably too radical, though. Let's meditate on this a bit.</p><p></p><p> 1d20 2d10 Armor</p><p>----------------------------</p><p> 1 100% 100% </p><p> 2 95% 100%</p><p> 3 90% 99%</p><p> 4 85% 97%</p><p> 5 80% 94%</p><p> 6 75% 90%</p><p> 7 70% 86%</p><p> 8 65% 79%</p><p> 9 60% 72%</p><p>10 55% 64% Nude</p><p>11 50% 55% Padded</p><p>12 45% 45% Leather</p><p>13 40% 36% Studded Leather</p><p>14 35% 28% Chain Shirt</p><p>15 30% 21% Chainmail</p><p>16 25% 15% Banded Mail</p><p>17 20% 10% Half Plate</p><p>18 15% 6% Full Plate</p><p>19 10% 3%</p><p>20 5% 1%</p><p></p><p>Under the d20 system, Joe Schmoe with +0 BAB can hit Joe Blow with AC 10 55% of the time. Under the 2d10 system this changes to 64% -- a nine percent difference, which to put it into perspective amounts to almost a +2 BAB in terms of percent chance to hit.</p><p> </p><p>Suppose Joe Blow decides to protect his assets with some padded armor. He throws a quilt over his head, say. In d20, this makes it 5% less likely that Joe Schmoe can damage him. In 2d10, it's 9%. At the very least, this suggests that the default AC of a nude palooka is going to have to be adjusted. </p><p></p><p>In d20, Joe Blow in a chain shirt is 20% harder to damage than he is in his birthday suit. In 2d10, he's 36% harder to hit. How long were you planning for combat to take? </p><p></p><p>Still, it's not a bad fit. A +1 still averages to about a 5% difference. It favors light armor, which will change the nature of the game. Difficulty checks and skills with be thrown all out of wack because skill points will be less effective at low and high levels.</p><p> </p><p>I'm sure I'm forgetting to mention something.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Johnny Angel, post: 1032595, member: 13334"] On the one hand, I like it. One thing I've always liked about GURPS was how the skills basically represented a shift in the bell curve. The difference it makes in a system designed on a linear probability curve is probably too radical, though. Let's meditate on this a bit. 1d20 2d10 Armor ---------------------------- 1 100% 100% 2 95% 100% 3 90% 99% 4 85% 97% 5 80% 94% 6 75% 90% 7 70% 86% 8 65% 79% 9 60% 72% 10 55% 64% Nude 11 50% 55% Padded 12 45% 45% Leather 13 40% 36% Studded Leather 14 35% 28% Chain Shirt 15 30% 21% Chainmail 16 25% 15% Banded Mail 17 20% 10% Half Plate 18 15% 6% Full Plate 19 10% 3% 20 5% 1% Under the d20 system, Joe Schmoe with +0 BAB can hit Joe Blow with AC 10 55% of the time. Under the 2d10 system this changes to 64% -- a nine percent difference, which to put it into perspective amounts to almost a +2 BAB in terms of percent chance to hit. Suppose Joe Blow decides to protect his assets with some padded armor. He throws a quilt over his head, say. In d20, this makes it 5% less likely that Joe Schmoe can damage him. In 2d10, it's 9%. At the very least, this suggests that the default AC of a nude palooka is going to have to be adjusted. In d20, Joe Blow in a chain shirt is 20% harder to damage than he is in his birthday suit. In 2d10, he's 36% harder to hit. How long were you planning for combat to take? Still, it's not a bad fit. A +1 still averages to about a 5% difference. It favors light armor, which will change the nature of the game. Difficulty checks and skills with be thrown all out of wack because skill points will be less effective at low and high levels. I'm sure I'm forgetting to mention something. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
2d10 rather than d20?
Top