Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ralif Redhammer" data-source="post: 2804092" data-attributes="member: 30438">I would say both yes and no.2e had much more inspiring art. It kept the archetypes of 1e intact. And yes, the settings were wonderful. Far more wonderous variety was available. And the maps were bigger and better. Kits undeniably could be unbalancing, but they really provided a lot of flavor.3e, however, has the iconics, and the core books were coupled with the Greyhawk setting (Though that seems to be increasingly little more than lip service). I do think that the art is a weak point, since very rarely does it bother to tell a story.In terms of flavor, I think 2e comes out on top, but 3e is not entirely without its merits.</blockquote>