Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Arauthator" data-source="post: 4004002" data-attributes="member: 46168">DigressionWhat would it hurt to keep supporting the older rules systems?That would be evolutionary in a marketing sense as well. But the reason I would like to see this, again in my own opinion, is that I would have the option to use quite a few sets of rules and still be able to purchase new material for those systems. The only reason I have the option to go back and play BASIC DnD, is because I've kept my material from the eighties. Going on to Ebay and purchasing all that stuff would cost a fortune and you would eventually hit a dead end. It can be done though. What would it hurt for WoTC to publish the old stuff on their website? Or to offer the old books with new art and keep the original text?I'm not trying to start an argument here, I just happen to be well informed, have played this game since 1980, and I love the works of Monte Cook, Skip Williams, and others like Ed Greenwood. I'm just not privy to people trying to accommodate everybody on the planet. The REASON behind the evolution is silly in my opinion. Now, if you were to keep on supporting the older rules systems, then that would truly be remarkable and honorable.</blockquote>