Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[2nd Draft] URPGs Essay One
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark" data-source="post: 474913" data-attributes="member: 5"><p>Perhaps...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not when ideally realized. In fact, in one form called the Harold (which is one of several "long form" improvosational techniques) they attempt to reach patrticular goals with scenes. They also attempt to build from one scene to the next to achieve a cohesive story (and possibly predetermined goals) with the series of scenes, even though the details of those scenes and the story are not realized until the Improv is complete. Sounds very much like an RPG to me.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Unlike a table top RPG...? Wha...? I think you'd better read what you wrote hear and give me a clue what I am missing.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, is real harm the goal of RPGs? I'm missing something again. Nonetheless, what you say above is also a function of RPGs, I believe.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Rules are mechanics. Are diceless RPGs not RPGs? As I undertstand them, they resolve conflict fairly closely to the same way as what you have just describe. It should also be mentioned that ultimately the mechanics of any RPG are merely a guideline to assist the facilitator in story telling. Bottom line is that the facilitator is the arbitor of of the outcome, not the mechanics. So, too, are the self-determinating members of an Improv the ultimate purveyor of the completed scene and free to break the "rules" if it furthers the story.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>You seem to have decided to exclude Improv (for whatever reason) and look to justify it retrospectively.</em> I'd suggest you define RPGs, if that is truly the goal, then examine Improv and exclude or include it based on your description. Either way you will certainly find some who disagree with your definaition and either include or disclude Improv for whatever reasons or whims they feel are valid in their own definition.</p><p></p><p>I think that your understanding of Improv leaves you in a poor position to determine whether it should be included or not. I'd leave the field completely out of your essay, if I were you, unless you plan to research the subject in earnest.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark, post: 474913, member: 5"] Perhaps... Not when ideally realized. In fact, in one form called the Harold (which is one of several "long form" improvosational techniques) they attempt to reach patrticular goals with scenes. They also attempt to build from one scene to the next to achieve a cohesive story (and possibly predetermined goals) with the series of scenes, even though the details of those scenes and the story are not realized until the Improv is complete. Sounds very much like an RPG to me. Unlike a table top RPG...? Wha...? I think you'd better read what you wrote hear and give me a clue what I am missing. Again, is real harm the goal of RPGs? I'm missing something again. Nonetheless, what you say above is also a function of RPGs, I believe. Rules are mechanics. Are diceless RPGs not RPGs? As I undertstand them, they resolve conflict fairly closely to the same way as what you have just describe. It should also be mentioned that ultimately the mechanics of any RPG are merely a guideline to assist the facilitator in story telling. Bottom line is that the facilitator is the arbitor of of the outcome, not the mechanics. So, too, are the self-determinating members of an Improv the ultimate purveyor of the completed scene and free to break the "rules" if it furthers the story. [i]You seem to have decided to exclude Improv (for whatever reason) and look to justify it retrospectively.[/i] I'd suggest you define RPGs, if that is truly the goal, then examine Improv and exclude or include it based on your description. Either way you will certainly find some who disagree with your definaition and either include or disclude Improv for whatever reasons or whims they feel are valid in their own definition. I think that your understanding of Improv leaves you in a poor position to determine whether it should be included or not. I'd leave the field completely out of your essay, if I were you, unless you plan to research the subject in earnest. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[2nd Draft] URPGs Essay One
Top