Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
3.0 Paladin Dragon Mount spell sharing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jefgorbach" data-source="post: 5223458" data-attributes="member: 28278"><p>Dross, </p><p>As noted, all OD&D familiars were mundane animals so the issue was moot until 1e added creatures like Imps without addressing the issue of Familar>Master spells/etc. </p><p></p><p>RAW allows such creatures to use their abilities on another within combat range, so its not a question of being able to do so, but rather WHAT can be shared via the link. TSR clearly stated the link was limited to general emotions only, then muddled the waters by allowing Familiars to share their familiarity with a place with their Master -- implying the link is indeed two-way, and CAN share more than general emotions. V3.0 clarified this by allowing the Familiar to share Feats and Skills which again clearly exceed general emotional content. </p><p></p><p>Given this, we can presume either TSR was either uncertain asto the meaning of "empathy" or were simply did an ineligant at expressing their intention. Accepting the latter as more likely, I provided Merriam-Webster's official defination of "empathy" as an accepted independent authority regarding the meaning of words. MW clearifies empathy is the ability to "vicariously experience the feelings, thoughts, and experiences of another" - confirming TSR/WOTc's useage as a means of two-way communication. </p><p></p><p>However since further clairification is needed, we can likewise lookup "communication", finding it means "1 : an act or instance of transmitting, 2a : information communicated b : a verbal or written message, 3 : a process by which information is exchanged between individuals through a common system of symbols, signs, or behavior". Its my belief a magical spell/innate spell-like-ability would qualify as communication per either defination #1 or (especially) defination #3 and thus WOULD be shareable via the empathic link.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jefgorbach, post: 5223458, member: 28278"] Dross, As noted, all OD&D familiars were mundane animals so the issue was moot until 1e added creatures like Imps without addressing the issue of Familar>Master spells/etc. RAW allows such creatures to use their abilities on another within combat range, so its not a question of being able to do so, but rather WHAT can be shared via the link. TSR clearly stated the link was limited to general emotions only, then muddled the waters by allowing Familiars to share their familiarity with a place with their Master -- implying the link is indeed two-way, and CAN share more than general emotions. V3.0 clarified this by allowing the Familiar to share Feats and Skills which again clearly exceed general emotional content. Given this, we can presume either TSR was either uncertain asto the meaning of "empathy" or were simply did an ineligant at expressing their intention. Accepting the latter as more likely, I provided Merriam-Webster's official defination of "empathy" as an accepted independent authority regarding the meaning of words. MW clearifies empathy is the ability to "vicariously experience the feelings, thoughts, and experiences of another" - confirming TSR/WOTc's useage as a means of two-way communication. However since further clairification is needed, we can likewise lookup "communication", finding it means "1 : an act or instance of transmitting, 2a : information communicated b : a verbal or written message, 3 : a process by which information is exchanged between individuals through a common system of symbols, signs, or behavior". Its my belief a magical spell/innate spell-like-ability would qualify as communication per either defination #1 or (especially) defination #3 and thus WOULD be shareable via the empathic link. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
3.0 Paladin Dragon Mount spell sharing
Top