Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
3.5 - Attacking mounted NPCs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greenfield" data-source="post: 5676591" data-attributes="member: 6669384"><p>The biggest advantage of the mounted archers is that they control the battlefield. They decide if they're going to let you close for melee, they decide when the battle ends, and how.</p><p></p><p>We used this in our own game last weekend. In the desert, attacked by nomadic monsters. We were mounted.</p><p></p><p>They charged, we withdrew, then cut them to pieces. The horse's base move is so much more than the foot speed of most opponents it actually seems unfair. We pulled back 100 feet on a double move from the horses. That was more than a double move of theirs could close, yet still within the first range increment on our composite bows. </p><p></p><p>1) We shoot them.</p><p>2) They double move 60 or 80 feet to set up a charge.</p><p>3) We pull back 50 or 60 feet (single move for the horse) to be outside of charge range, then go back to step 1.</p><p></p><p>Rinse/repeat as needed.</p><p></p><p>The uglier tactic, in a world where people know about magic, is to single move your horse in close, fire at the enemy, then single move your horse back out again. Ideally, the "out" in that sentence is "out of sight".</p><p></p><p>Mount an attack, with troops staging for a major combat, and watch while the enemy casters throw up their battle-magic protections. Once they're ready, you withdraw and wait 10 minutes, then do it again. Rinse/repeat until the enemy has no more battle magic preps to cast, then follow through with that attack. (I did say that it was an uglier tactic, didn't I?)</p><p></p><p>Both of these approaches play out far poorer in an underground setting, as there may not be a way to be beyond charge range and still have a shot, nor is it so easy to withdraw beyond hope of pursuit.</p><p></p><p>Bringing in thoughts from the archery thread, it makes me harken back to older editions, where ranges indoor and underground were cut in thirds. Arrows, to travel the longer distances, need a certain amount of ceiling clearance. The "arch" in "archery" comes into play.</p><p></p><p>Not a consideration in 3.* though, but line of sight still is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greenfield, post: 5676591, member: 6669384"] The biggest advantage of the mounted archers is that they control the battlefield. They decide if they're going to let you close for melee, they decide when the battle ends, and how. We used this in our own game last weekend. In the desert, attacked by nomadic monsters. We were mounted. They charged, we withdrew, then cut them to pieces. The horse's base move is so much more than the foot speed of most opponents it actually seems unfair. We pulled back 100 feet on a double move from the horses. That was more than a double move of theirs could close, yet still within the first range increment on our composite bows. 1) We shoot them. 2) They double move 60 or 80 feet to set up a charge. 3) We pull back 50 or 60 feet (single move for the horse) to be outside of charge range, then go back to step 1. Rinse/repeat as needed. The uglier tactic, in a world where people know about magic, is to single move your horse in close, fire at the enemy, then single move your horse back out again. Ideally, the "out" in that sentence is "out of sight". Mount an attack, with troops staging for a major combat, and watch while the enemy casters throw up their battle-magic protections. Once they're ready, you withdraw and wait 10 minutes, then do it again. Rinse/repeat until the enemy has no more battle magic preps to cast, then follow through with that attack. (I did say that it was an uglier tactic, didn't I?) Both of these approaches play out far poorer in an underground setting, as there may not be a way to be beyond charge range and still have a shot, nor is it so easy to withdraw beyond hope of pursuit. Bringing in thoughts from the archery thread, it makes me harken back to older editions, where ranges indoor and underground were cut in thirds. Arrows, to travel the longer distances, need a certain amount of ceiling clearance. The "arch" in "archery" comes into play. Not a consideration in 3.* though, but line of sight still is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
3.5 - Attacking mounted NPCs
Top