Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
3.5 Backwards compatibility
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Number47" data-source="post: 926630" data-attributes="member: 84"><p>Of course WotC is doing this for money. The fact is, though, that is not a bad thing. After all, they can only make money from the revision if people want the revision. Thus, the fact that they decided to make the revision is proof that we wanted, not some plot to force us to buy books.</p><p></p><p>Yes, it was a long time between editions in 1E/2E. This was not a good thing. Did anyone play in a regular campaign that wasn't heavy on house rules? I think one unstated mission of 3E/3.5E is to try to keep games mostly the same across the spectrum, rules-wise. They are putting out the new edition before houseruling in home campaigns becomes a necessity. It is a good thing for everyone to be playing the same game.</p><p></p><p>Do you guys remember playing D&D before it was a designed system and just some ad-hoc collection of rules? It was a mess! This is the first time in history that a fantasy roleplaying game has been so concise and complete. No wonder there needs to be a revision, nobody had ever done such a thing before and there were bound to be some hiccups. 3.5 is the hiccups removed.</p><p></p><p>Last thing, this is not a new edition. This is a rules update. Attacking, damage, hit points, magic system, base classes, experience. These are all the same. The things that are changing are mostly tweaks. Even those tweaks can be used or not used as you choose, because it is the same basic system.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Number47, post: 926630, member: 84"] Of course WotC is doing this for money. The fact is, though, that is not a bad thing. After all, they can only make money from the revision if people want the revision. Thus, the fact that they decided to make the revision is proof that we wanted, not some plot to force us to buy books. Yes, it was a long time between editions in 1E/2E. This was not a good thing. Did anyone play in a regular campaign that wasn't heavy on house rules? I think one unstated mission of 3E/3.5E is to try to keep games mostly the same across the spectrum, rules-wise. They are putting out the new edition before houseruling in home campaigns becomes a necessity. It is a good thing for everyone to be playing the same game. Do you guys remember playing D&D before it was a designed system and just some ad-hoc collection of rules? It was a mess! This is the first time in history that a fantasy roleplaying game has been so concise and complete. No wonder there needs to be a revision, nobody had ever done such a thing before and there were bound to be some hiccups. 3.5 is the hiccups removed. Last thing, this is not a new edition. This is a rules update. Attacking, damage, hit points, magic system, base classes, experience. These are all the same. The things that are changing are mostly tweaks. Even those tweaks can be used or not used as you choose, because it is the same basic system. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
3.5 Backwards compatibility
Top