Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
3.5 Beholders, Mind Flayers, Yuan-tis...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="woodelf" data-source="post: 1080630" data-attributes="member: 10201"><p>Actually, one of the on-again, off-again discussions on the OGF lists is the nature of PI. There are two issues: what it takes to declare PI, and how much power the PI restrictions really have.</p><p></p><p>On the first count, one reading of the WotC OGL is that PI is only meaningful within OGC, and has zero legal meaning in "normal" (closed) content. I.e., Since those terms never appear in OGC ('cause they're not in the D20SRD, either version, and none of the content of WotC's books is released as OGC), they aren't actually PI, despite the claim in the D20SRD(3.5). Instead, they are regular closed content, governed by standard copyright/trademark laws (which, in this case, isn't likely to afford much protection)</p><p></p><p>On the 2nd count, the question is whether PI is "forbidden" or "unavailable". If it is forbidden, then by agreeing to the WotC OGL, you are agreeing not to use the PI, regardless of source. If it is unavailable, then you merely can't use it from that source--it's as though someone had whited out all instances of PI before giving you the book, and it's just not there. But if you take it from another source, you're fine (provided you do so legally--within the bounds of Fair Use, or via the WotC OGL, or with permission, or whatever). </p><p></p><p>Also, there's the question of the lineage of PI: there is no requirement to reproduce PI when you derive from a work, so it's pretty easy to not know about PI from a work that is an antecedent to the work you're actually sourcing. So the question becomes, are you expected to track down all previous sources, and abide by those PI restrictions, too, or just those of works you are directly deriving from?</p><p></p><p>Anyway, the upshot of all this is that the particular character and likeness (including appearance and culture) of those monsters might very well be off-limits (i think the concept of character copyright extends to things like unique races of beings, not just unique beings), ditto for the stats (again, how much protection copyright affords them is in limbo), but the names themselves quite possibly are fair game (depending on the nature of PI, and what sources you work with).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="woodelf, post: 1080630, member: 10201"] Actually, one of the on-again, off-again discussions on the OGF lists is the nature of PI. There are two issues: what it takes to declare PI, and how much power the PI restrictions really have. On the first count, one reading of the WotC OGL is that PI is only meaningful within OGC, and has zero legal meaning in "normal" (closed) content. I.e., Since those terms never appear in OGC ('cause they're not in the D20SRD, either version, and none of the content of WotC's books is released as OGC), they aren't actually PI, despite the claim in the D20SRD(3.5). Instead, they are regular closed content, governed by standard copyright/trademark laws (which, in this case, isn't likely to afford much protection) On the 2nd count, the question is whether PI is "forbidden" or "unavailable". If it is forbidden, then by agreeing to the WotC OGL, you are agreeing not to use the PI, regardless of source. If it is unavailable, then you merely can't use it from that source--it's as though someone had whited out all instances of PI before giving you the book, and it's just not there. But if you take it from another source, you're fine (provided you do so legally--within the bounds of Fair Use, or via the WotC OGL, or with permission, or whatever). Also, there's the question of the lineage of PI: there is no requirement to reproduce PI when you derive from a work, so it's pretty easy to not know about PI from a work that is an antecedent to the work you're actually sourcing. So the question becomes, are you expected to track down all previous sources, and abide by those PI restrictions, too, or just those of works you are directly deriving from? Anyway, the upshot of all this is that the particular character and likeness (including appearance and culture) of those monsters might very well be off-limits (i think the concept of character copyright extends to things like unique races of beings, not just unique beings), ditto for the stats (again, how much protection copyright affords them is in limbo), but the names themselves quite possibly are fair game (depending on the nature of PI, and what sources you work with). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
3.5 Beholders, Mind Flayers, Yuan-tis...
Top