D&D 3.x [3.5] Bigger Cones

[Pax]

Now, should they have not put the area measurements in the range? Yeah, that was a screwup. Someone will probably find a way to misinterpret it. They should all be submitted as errata.

J

I agree. Cones should all be Range 0, and then have their length (etc) defined as their Area of Effect.

 

[The Souljourner]

Am I the only one who saw the title of this thread and *wasn't* thinking about spells?

-The Souljourner

 

[Pax]

Am I the only one who saw the title of this thread and *wasn't* thinking about spells?

-The Souljourner

Yes.