Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
[3.5] - Can you Take 10 or Take 20 on a Hide check?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Urbannen" data-source="post: 1088774" data-attributes="member: 7643"><p>Take 10 and Take 20 are two different things, so I'm not sure how you could compare them. </p><p></p><p>Here is a short analysis of the skills needed to detect and conceal objects and creatures. </p><p></p><p>There are 3 categories to consider: </p><p></p><p>creature or object </p><p>moving or unmoving </p><p><10' away or >10' away (you can Search for something < or equal to 10' feet away, but not farther)</p><p></p><p>for each category, which skill is used to conceal and which is needed to detect the thing is question? </p><p></p><p>(moving/unmoving) (creature/object) (<>10' away)(skill to conceal/detect) </p><p>moving creature <10' away: Hide, Spot</p><p>unmoving creature <10' away: Hide, Spot</p><p>moving creature >10' away: Hide, Spot</p><p>unmoving creature >10' away: Hide, Spot</p><p>moving object <10' away: none, Spot</p><p>unmoving object <10' away: none , Search</p><p>moving object >10' away: none, Spot</p><p>unmoving object >10' away: none , Spot</p><p></p><p>You use Spot to detect all moving things.</p><p>You use Spot to detect all creatures.</p><p>You use Hide to conceal all creatures from view.</p><p>There is no skill for concealing objects from view.</p><p></p><p>You only use Search to detect unmoving objects that are <10' away. You don't use it to detect unmoving creatures. You don't use it to detect unmoving objects farther away than 10'. </p><p></p><p>This is not consistent because an unmoving creature is essentially no different from an object of the same size and shape, yet there is a different skills set associated with each one.</p><p></p><p>You can visually Search for something in a square 10 feet away from you, but you cannot Search for anything farther away than that, even though it is possible to see farther than 10 feet. </p><p></p><p>Hide is popularly used to conceal an unmoving creature from sight, but the skill description says that the skill is normally used with a move action. </p><p></p><p>An easy way to make the system consistent would be to get rid of the Search skill. Use Spot for both detecting stealthy creatures as well as traps. If you hide an unmoving object, including yourself, in a place that has less than 100% concealment, use an Intelligence check to determine the Spot DC. You could take 20 on this check. In order to find something with 100% concealment, a PC has to describe looking in the right place. </p><p></p><p>A complicated way to make the system consistent would be to use Search for all conscious detection and Spot for all unconscious detection. You would use a Search check to determine the Search DC for when a character hides an unmoving object, including himself. <strong>In essence you are Searching for the best hiding place, and thus could take a 20.</strong> You would use a Hide check for when a character moves stealthily. You could use both Search and Spot from a distance with a penalty. It would be easier to detect an unmoving object with Search. The chance to detect an unmoving object with Spot would be equal to the Search DC plus 5. Thus anyone could detect a secret door (Search DC 20) by making a DC 25 Spot check (elves would in essence get a +3 racial bonus on their chance to Spot secret doors). </p><p></p><p>You would determine the Search DC for traps and secret doors through some use of Craft(trapmaking) and Profession(architect) checks. Maybe: Hide a door in a structure with Search DC 20 - Profession (architect) check DC 15. Create a hidden trap with Search DC 20 - Craft (trapmaking) check DC 15.</p><p></p><p>Edit: things don't line up the same in the actual post.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Urbannen, post: 1088774, member: 7643"] Take 10 and Take 20 are two different things, so I'm not sure how you could compare them. Here is a short analysis of the skills needed to detect and conceal objects and creatures. There are 3 categories to consider: creature or object moving or unmoving <10' away or >10' away (you can Search for something < or equal to 10' feet away, but not farther) for each category, which skill is used to conceal and which is needed to detect the thing is question? (moving/unmoving) (creature/object) (<>10' away)(skill to conceal/detect) moving creature <10' away: Hide, Spot unmoving creature <10' away: Hide, Spot moving creature >10' away: Hide, Spot unmoving creature >10' away: Hide, Spot moving object <10' away: none, Spot unmoving object <10' away: none , Search moving object >10' away: none, Spot unmoving object >10' away: none , Spot You use Spot to detect all moving things. You use Spot to detect all creatures. You use Hide to conceal all creatures from view. There is no skill for concealing objects from view. You only use Search to detect unmoving objects that are <10' away. You don't use it to detect unmoving creatures. You don't use it to detect unmoving objects farther away than 10'. This is not consistent because an unmoving creature is essentially no different from an object of the same size and shape, yet there is a different skills set associated with each one. You can visually Search for something in a square 10 feet away from you, but you cannot Search for anything farther away than that, even though it is possible to see farther than 10 feet. Hide is popularly used to conceal an unmoving creature from sight, but the skill description says that the skill is normally used with a move action. An easy way to make the system consistent would be to get rid of the Search skill. Use Spot for both detecting stealthy creatures as well as traps. If you hide an unmoving object, including yourself, in a place that has less than 100% concealment, use an Intelligence check to determine the Spot DC. You could take 20 on this check. In order to find something with 100% concealment, a PC has to describe looking in the right place. A complicated way to make the system consistent would be to use Search for all conscious detection and Spot for all unconscious detection. You would use a Search check to determine the Search DC for when a character hides an unmoving object, including himself. [b]In essence you are Searching for the best hiding place, and thus could take a 20.[/b] You would use a Hide check for when a character moves stealthily. You could use both Search and Spot from a distance with a penalty. It would be easier to detect an unmoving object with Search. The chance to detect an unmoving object with Spot would be equal to the Search DC plus 5. Thus anyone could detect a secret door (Search DC 20) by making a DC 25 Spot check (elves would in essence get a +3 racial bonus on their chance to Spot secret doors). You would determine the Search DC for traps and secret doors through some use of Craft(trapmaking) and Profession(architect) checks. Maybe: Hide a door in a structure with Search DC 20 - Profession (architect) check DC 15. Create a hidden trap with Search DC 20 - Craft (trapmaking) check DC 15. Edit: things don't line up the same in the actual post. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
[3.5] - Can you Take 10 or Take 20 on a Hide check?
Top