Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Technik4" data-source="post: 1002482" data-attributes="member: 7211">Beating a Dead Horse Look, when I say that the core rules should be made with expansion in mind, I mean that they should have logical rule systems and sub-systems that are modular in nature.IOW, I dont think either the new rule nor the old was very modular. The old rule allowed stacking with 2 things, and implied that any other stacking wouldn't stack. The new rule disallows the one exception, and says that nothing else stacks. Neither of these seem to take their own supplements nor any other 3rd party supplements into account as there are now many people scratching their head about Weapon Master's improved critical class feature.3e and d20 were a vision of a unified community, to make a rule-set that is purposely unwieldy to expand is idiocy.Note: I dont think 3e is very unwieldy to expand, but there are some sore spots. All I was saying is the revision should have gone over said sore spots and smoothed them over, which in many cases they did. But not with regards to crit-stacking.Technik</blockquote>