Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
[3.5] Crit stacking?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mike Sullivan" data-source="post: 1006164" data-attributes="member: 9824"><p>No, it won't.</p><p></p><p>As you've been told several times, the reason you can ignore chance to hit in this analysis is that it doesn't change from person to person.</p><p></p><p>However, I'll just demonstrate it.</p><p></p><p>Okay, so we're going to compare two people</p><p></p><p>Person A has a longsword +2 that's not keen, and improved critical. He's a level 8 fighter with a 16 Str, weapon focus and specialization in longsword, and no other bonuses.</p><p></p><p>Person B has a rapier +2 that's not keen, and improved crit. He's a lavel 8 fighter with a 16 Str, weapon focus and specialization in rapier, and no other bonuses.</p><p></p><p>Each person has a +14/+9 modified attack bonus. The longsword guy does 1d8 + 7 damage with a 17-20/x2 crit, and the rapier guy does 1d6 + 7 damage with a 15-20/x2 crit. They're attacking a target with AC 20.</p><p></p><p>First, the analysis that doesn't bother with chance to hit:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><br /> Longsword guy does 1d8 + 7 damage before crits. That averages to 4.5 + 7 = 11.5. His crit is 17-20/x2, which translates to a 1.2 multiplier. Thus, his expected damage per hit is 13.8<br /> <br /> Rapier guy does 1d6 + 7 damage before crits. That averages to 3.5 + 7 = 10.5. His crit is 15-20/x2, which translates to a 1.3 multiplier. Thus, his expected damage per hit is 13.65.<br /> <br /> Thus, longsword guy does 101.0989% the damage of rapier guy. (13.8 / 13.65)</li> </ul><p></p><p>Second, the analysis that does bother with chance to hit:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><br /> Longsword guy hits on a 6+ with his primary attack and 11+ with his secondary attack. That translates to a 75% chance to hit with his first attack and a 50% chance to hit with his second attack. As we can see above, his expected damage per hit is 13.8, so his expected damage per round is .75(13.8) + .5(13.8) = 17.25.<br /> <br /> Rapier guy hits on a 6+ with his primary attack and 11+ with his secondary attack. That translates to a 75% chance to hit with his first attack and a 50% chance to hit with his second attack. As we can see above, his expected damage per hit is 13.65, so his expected damage per round is .75(13.65) + .5(13.65) = 17.0625.<br /> <br /> So now we divide 17.25 by 17.0625, and we see that longsword guy does... 101.0989% the damage of the rapier guy.</li> </ul><p></p><p>Tah-dah.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mike Sullivan, post: 1006164, member: 9824"] No, it won't. As you've been told several times, the reason you can ignore chance to hit in this analysis is that it doesn't change from person to person. However, I'll just demonstrate it. Okay, so we're going to compare two people Person A has a longsword +2 that's not keen, and improved critical. He's a level 8 fighter with a 16 Str, weapon focus and specialization in longsword, and no other bonuses. Person B has a rapier +2 that's not keen, and improved crit. He's a lavel 8 fighter with a 16 Str, weapon focus and specialization in rapier, and no other bonuses. Each person has a +14/+9 modified attack bonus. The longsword guy does 1d8 + 7 damage with a 17-20/x2 crit, and the rapier guy does 1d6 + 7 damage with a 15-20/x2 crit. They're attacking a target with AC 20. First, the analysis that doesn't bother with chance to hit: [list] Longsword guy does 1d8 + 7 damage before crits. That averages to 4.5 + 7 = 11.5. His crit is 17-20/x2, which translates to a 1.2 multiplier. Thus, his expected damage per hit is 13.8 Rapier guy does 1d6 + 7 damage before crits. That averages to 3.5 + 7 = 10.5. His crit is 15-20/x2, which translates to a 1.3 multiplier. Thus, his expected damage per hit is 13.65. Thus, longsword guy does 101.0989% the damage of rapier guy. (13.8 / 13.65) [/list] Second, the analysis that does bother with chance to hit: [list] Longsword guy hits on a 6+ with his primary attack and 11+ with his secondary attack. That translates to a 75% chance to hit with his first attack and a 50% chance to hit with his second attack. As we can see above, his expected damage per hit is 13.8, so his expected damage per round is .75(13.8) + .5(13.8) = 17.25. Rapier guy hits on a 6+ with his primary attack and 11+ with his secondary attack. That translates to a 75% chance to hit with his first attack and a 50% chance to hit with his second attack. As we can see above, his expected damage per hit is 13.65, so his expected damage per round is .75(13.65) + .5(13.65) = 17.0625. So now we divide 17.25 by 17.0625, and we see that longsword guy does... 101.0989% the damage of the rapier guy. [/list] Tah-dah. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
[3.5] Crit stacking?
Top