Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ancient Gamer" data-source="post: 1021579" data-attributes="member: 13235"><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek!    :o"  data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" />   Here's something, why don't we make a place for people to voice there opinions/views/arguments in a constructive/mature manner (aside from some sarcasium), and call it a... forum? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":eek:" title="Eek!    :eek:"  data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":eek:" /> Wow! Looky here, its a forum! (dripping sarcasium <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> )To anyone who cares to read this, then think about what is being said...and not said.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> This is, I believe, an informative statement when I, me, myself, decides to bitch about how WotC tries to conceal the idea that this is not a new edition of D&D, but an revision of the rules.  Hello?  Am I and the few who have seen it the only ones?  Revised rules for better play? Enough of a change to warrent a new set of core rules to be issued.  Gee, that sounds like another Edition to me.  Come on! Compare it to 1st AD&D revised enough to warrent 2nd Ed AD&D, enough similarity to use some of the 1st Ed stuff with conversion notes to "help you along into the 2nd Ed AD&D.  The similarities between this and 3rd Ed to 3.5 Ed (aka 4th Ed)is there.  There is NO, I repeat! No bashing about the 3.5 Ed rules released, if anything, its nice to see some of those changes.  The issue is it should be called 4th Edition D&D!  A very trivial, but debateble topic. Yes? Of course this is only my opinion in a forum where one can present thier views.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> If you don't agree....Great! Give an informative reason.  If you do agree, then I get to smile. Yaaa  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />  Convince me differently. I'm good for it. I will admit the rules differences are not as drastic in comparison to the 1st to 2nd Ed's, but there is relevance and enough change to make it a consideration that yes, it might just be referred to as a 4th Edition of the D&D system.  So stop getting your underwear in knott! Please.Cheers! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

Verification