Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Argyle King" data-source="post: 5181696" data-attributes="member: 58416">Thanks.&nbsp; It's an interesting read; though, as always, I disagree about how low bards are rated.&nbsp; That's getting off topic though.&nbsp;&nbsp;At some point I still might pick up PF even if I don't plan on playing it.&nbsp; My first exposure to the system came via a game I played using a different system which used the Pathfinder world and fluff.&nbsp; PF seems to have a lot of good story and background ideas that I would like to use.&nbsp; This is what sparked some of my thought about buying it, but I originally put the idea on the back of the shelf.&nbsp;What made me consider buying the system more is that I suddenly seem to have a lot of people asking me to play D&amp;D 3rd Edition again; I have a rather hefty 3rd Edition library.&nbsp; I have a few tweaks I've made to the system myself; I was curious what PF was like.&nbsp; It seems to be selling fairly well here in my local area.&nbsp;The only other question I really have is whether or not saves and BAB are done differently in PF...?&nbsp; One of the alternate 3E rules I liked to use was fractional progressions as presented in Unearthed Arcana.&nbsp; This seemed to touch up multiclassing a little bit, and it somewhat prevented someone from having one crazy good save and one complete crap save due to multiclassing.&nbsp;Overall, PF looks good, and I like the feel of the setting.&nbsp; I think Paizo did a very good job with their fluff and story.&nbsp; I don't have enough experience with the mechanics to comment on that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Argyle King, post: 5181696, member: 58416"] Thanks. It's an interesting read; though, as always, I disagree about how low bards are rated. That's getting off topic though. At some point I still might pick up PF even if I don't plan on playing it. My first exposure to the system came via a game I played using a different system which used the Pathfinder world and fluff. PF seems to have a lot of good story and background ideas that I would like to use. This is what sparked some of my thought about buying it, but I originally put the idea on the back of the shelf. What made me consider buying the system more is that I suddenly seem to have a lot of people asking me to play D&D 3rd Edition again; I have a rather hefty 3rd Edition library. I have a few tweaks I've made to the system myself; I was curious what PF was like. It seems to be selling fairly well here in my local area. The only other question I really have is whether or not saves and BAB are done differently in PF...? One of the alternate 3E rules I liked to use was fractional progressions as presented in Unearthed Arcana. This seemed to touch up multiclassing a little bit, and it somewhat prevented someone from having one crazy good save and one complete crap save due to multiclassing. Overall, PF looks good, and I like the feel of the setting. I think Paizo did a very good job with their fluff and story. I don't have enough experience with the mechanics to comment on that. [/QUOTE]

Verification