Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="nonsi256" data-source="post: 5026035" data-attributes="member: 86164">Let’s see what we’re talking about here.  - Poor writing skills: if you refer to the fact that not all the info is there, that’s because I see no reason in repeating the things that remains consistent to the RAW. If you’re talking about something else, I’d like to know what it is.  - Poor organization: I’d like to see someone else do a better job with 50,000 chars per entry limit.  - Bizarre attempts to fix things that aren't really broken: name them and I’ll show you my motivations and what I was aiming trying to achieve.        - New rule innovations that simply reflect his personal taste: not a single rule is in there purely for satisfying my personal taste. There’s almost nothing in there that didn’t undergo several transformation before I was convinced I got it right. I have no sacred cows.         I don’t know why you gt this impression, but I assure you this is not the case.         Then just ask.         What or who is PP?   Clunky in what way?        What’s not clear about the class or makes orientation a difficult task? I’ve encountered this claim here & there, but constructive suggestions on the actual problems or remedy never came. None of my 8 stats can be referred to as “mostly dump”. How so? What do you find crucially missing?        6 is purely traditional.  In OD&D Cha was pure dump for everybody, Wis was useful only Clerics and Int only for Magic Users (which had absolutely nothing useful to do with Str).        In 3e every attribute can augment every stat with the appropriate feat (gave up any attempt to analyze 1e & 2e). They create more options to mold your character as you envision it and each selection has its advantages over other selections during gametime, and... you don’t get your weapon prof shoved down your throat. You’re kidding, right?  Rolling for init each and every round?... and then applying the augmentations on a case by case scenario?  What is that if not bookkeeping? </blockquote>

Verification