Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
3.5 or 4th edition?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 5285238" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>You missed a lot. But 4th is a very different game from 3rd and going in trying to play 3rd in 4th is doomed.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>You know what feels video gamish to me? Vancian Casting. The idea that you never actually learn spells. They are merely plot coupons you can use if you've chosen to prepare them. And they allow you to re-write most of your character sheet on the fly with no coherent reason. Powers merely feel cinematic.</p><p> </p><p>To put things even more clearly - with the exception of Jack Vance and clearly D&D derived stories I can not recall one single example of Vancian Casting that isn't pure gamism. On the other hand I can recall many stories where someone has a signature move that they don't always use and they wait some time before using their strongest abilities rather than spamming them.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>That's just practice and a statblock. The 4e statblock is about half the length of the 3e one, and the post-MM3 one is better laid out than any previous edition's. (And then we get to the 2e Monster Manual where the stats for the basic creatures weren't actually presented).</p><p> </p><p>And for keeping track, try casting Dispel Magic on a mid level group...</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>And it's still less complex than 3e. Exception based design means that the options don't add linearly and the DM doesn't even need to worry about most of them. In 3e whenever you added a book with spells in it then the whole thing was available to everyone - that added massively to complexity. In 4e if you add ten classes and twenty builds, that doesn't add much complexity at the sharp end. But does extend the design space of what's possible. (That said, I'm not a fan of the PHB3 - but the PHB2 is wonderful).</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Are you kidding? The chapter by Robin Laws on player types has more actual useful advice for running a good game than <em>every single previous DMG combined</em>. Including the ones by Gary Gygax.</p><p> </p><p>And malt vinegar actually IIRC catches more flies than honey.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 5285238, member: 87792"] You missed a lot. But 4th is a very different game from 3rd and going in trying to play 3rd in 4th is doomed. You know what feels video gamish to me? Vancian Casting. The idea that you never actually learn spells. They are merely plot coupons you can use if you've chosen to prepare them. And they allow you to re-write most of your character sheet on the fly with no coherent reason. Powers merely feel cinematic. To put things even more clearly - with the exception of Jack Vance and clearly D&D derived stories I can not recall one single example of Vancian Casting that isn't pure gamism. On the other hand I can recall many stories where someone has a signature move that they don't always use and they wait some time before using their strongest abilities rather than spamming them. That's just practice and a statblock. The 4e statblock is about half the length of the 3e one, and the post-MM3 one is better laid out than any previous edition's. (And then we get to the 2e Monster Manual where the stats for the basic creatures weren't actually presented). And for keeping track, try casting Dispel Magic on a mid level group... And it's still less complex than 3e. Exception based design means that the options don't add linearly and the DM doesn't even need to worry about most of them. In 3e whenever you added a book with spells in it then the whole thing was available to everyone - that added massively to complexity. In 4e if you add ten classes and twenty builds, that doesn't add much complexity at the sharp end. But does extend the design space of what's possible. (That said, I'm not a fan of the PHB3 - but the PHB2 is wonderful). Are you kidding? The chapter by Robin Laws on player types has more actual useful advice for running a good game than [I]every single previous DMG combined[/I]. Including the ones by Gary Gygax. And malt vinegar actually IIRC catches more flies than honey. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
3.5 or 4th edition?
Top