Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[3.5] Power Attack - can this possibly be right?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elder-Basilisk" data-source="post: 986559" data-attributes="member: 3146"><p>The difficulty of accounting for cleave is the reason that people don't do it. </p><p></p><p>For average damage/round calculations all you need to know is the character's offense relevant statistics and equipment and the AC of the target. In order to include Cleave, you need to also know the hit points of the target and assign a probability that the character is in an appropriate position to cleave.</p><p></p><p>For creatures like bugbears or zombies and low-level fighters, it's fairly simple. (Zombies are a case where it's often a good idea to power attack in damage/round calculations and cleave serves to multiply the usefulness of power attack; Bugbears are an instance in which it may be advantageous to power attack even though ordinary damage/round calculations show it to be disadvantageous--because cleave nets more attacks).</p><p></p><p>Someone did some calculations with a matrix which was the part of math I never really understood how to use in High School (the last time I studied any math). My very rough concept math didn't deal with damage/round in hit points but rather in monsters and went something like this:</p><p></p><p>Fighter (lvl 4, Str 16, +1 greatsword, weapon specialization= attack bonus +9, damage=2d6+7 (average 13)), fighting lots of AC 17, 15 hp opponent (bugbear IIRC)--assuming that he is always in a position to cleave.</p><p></p><p>W/out power attack, he hits 65% of the time but takes two average hits to drop the bugbear. On the second hit, he will drop the bugbear and cleave into another. Hitting 65% of the time, he therefore drops 11 bugbears in 20 rounds.</p><p></p><p>If he power attacks for 3, OTOH, he deals an average of 16 points of damage 50% of the time. Consequently, he's likely to drop 15 bugbears over 20 rounds.</p><p></p><p>Clearly, my math is somewhat lacking because I assume that every hit will deal average damage. In reality, the non-power attacker will single-shot bugbears on a roll of 10 or better (about 7/36 chance of that) and the power attacker will need a second hit to drop the bugbear on a roll of 6 or lower (about 16/36 chance of that). Nor does it account for critical hits which single-shot the bugbears whether or not the character is power attacking. So the math should come out to much less than the apparent 50% increase in bugbear killing predicted by my average damage assumption.</p><p></p><p>The math is more complex when you run into a situation like large or huge zombies or some animals where power attacking means the difference between killing the creature in two blows or killing it in 3. (Especially when a character has multiple attacks). As I said, I'm not knowledgable enough in matrix theory to make a managable formula for that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elder-Basilisk, post: 986559, member: 3146"] The difficulty of accounting for cleave is the reason that people don't do it. For average damage/round calculations all you need to know is the character's offense relevant statistics and equipment and the AC of the target. In order to include Cleave, you need to also know the hit points of the target and assign a probability that the character is in an appropriate position to cleave. For creatures like bugbears or zombies and low-level fighters, it's fairly simple. (Zombies are a case where it's often a good idea to power attack in damage/round calculations and cleave serves to multiply the usefulness of power attack; Bugbears are an instance in which it may be advantageous to power attack even though ordinary damage/round calculations show it to be disadvantageous--because cleave nets more attacks). Someone did some calculations with a matrix which was the part of math I never really understood how to use in High School (the last time I studied any math). My very rough concept math didn't deal with damage/round in hit points but rather in monsters and went something like this: Fighter (lvl 4, Str 16, +1 greatsword, weapon specialization= attack bonus +9, damage=2d6+7 (average 13)), fighting lots of AC 17, 15 hp opponent (bugbear IIRC)--assuming that he is always in a position to cleave. W/out power attack, he hits 65% of the time but takes two average hits to drop the bugbear. On the second hit, he will drop the bugbear and cleave into another. Hitting 65% of the time, he therefore drops 11 bugbears in 20 rounds. If he power attacks for 3, OTOH, he deals an average of 16 points of damage 50% of the time. Consequently, he's likely to drop 15 bugbears over 20 rounds. Clearly, my math is somewhat lacking because I assume that every hit will deal average damage. In reality, the non-power attacker will single-shot bugbears on a roll of 10 or better (about 7/36 chance of that) and the power attacker will need a second hit to drop the bugbear on a roll of 6 or lower (about 16/36 chance of that). Nor does it account for critical hits which single-shot the bugbears whether or not the character is power attacking. So the math should come out to much less than the apparent 50% increase in bugbear killing predicted by my average damage assumption. The math is more complex when you run into a situation like large or huge zombies or some animals where power attacking means the difference between killing the creature in two blows or killing it in 3. (Especially when a character has multiple attacks). As I said, I'm not knowledgable enough in matrix theory to make a managable formula for that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[3.5] Power Attack - can this possibly be right?
Top