Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Argus Decimus Mokira" data-source="post: 987565" data-attributes="member: 10239">Errrr ... oh yeah, some comments and stuff ...Finesse Attack is the old Power Attack, but now only useable for lighter weapons.&nbsp; It's the same list as Weapon Finesse - if 3.5 changes that list more than Olgar has posted over on the General board, the list will change accordingly.&nbsp; Thus, this feat is for finesse fighters (and possibly two-weapon wielders and dual wielders).This version of Power Attack is the 3.5 version, only with set numbers instead of a variable amount.&nbsp; I changed this only because I envision Power Attacking to be making crushing but wild &quot;haymaker&quot; swings, leaving yourself open to counter attack.&nbsp; This feat is better for two-handed and shield tanks, though two-weapon and dual-wielders might want it too.&nbsp; Quick question - should the AC penalty be greater?Thanks-Matt</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Argus Decimus Mokira, post: 987565, member: 10239"] Errrr ... oh yeah, some comments and stuff ... Finesse Attack is the old Power Attack, but now only useable for lighter weapons. It's the same list as Weapon Finesse - if 3.5 changes that list more than Olgar has posted over on the General board, the list will change accordingly. Thus, this feat is for finesse fighters (and possibly two-weapon wielders and dual wielders). This version of Power Attack is the 3.5 version, only with set numbers instead of a variable amount. I changed this only because I envision Power Attacking to be making crushing but wild "haymaker" swings, leaving yourself open to counter attack. This feat is better for two-handed and shield tanks, though two-weapon and dual-wielders might want it too. Quick question - should the AC penalty be greater? Thanks -Matt [/QUOTE]

Verification