Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Marshall" data-source="post: 1459668" data-attributes="member: 765">Then its up to the DM running the game to note that the PrC is outside the acceptable scope of the game. Just because a 3rd party makes something that breaks the rules doesn't mean you go change the rules.What loophole? The changes to 3.5 nerfed a lot of reasonable to weak options while leaving most of the really abusive loopholes in place. On the subject of spell DC's, Spell Power was causing 90%+ of the problem, GSF a small percantage and SCP even less. The answer was to nerf Spell Power, OK done. But they didn't stop there, they went on and nerfed GSF, and then SCP and then bombed SF! Making change after change that did nothing other than further reduce the effectiveness of already weak options.All the while leaving the really abusive stuff like Gate and Mords Disjunction alone....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Marshall, post: 1459668, member: 765"] Then its up to the DM running the game to note that the PrC is outside the acceptable scope of the game. Just because a 3rd party makes something that breaks the rules doesn't mean you go change the rules. What loophole? The changes to 3.5 nerfed a lot of reasonable to weak options while leaving most of the really abusive loopholes in place. On the subject of spell DC's, [i]Spell Power[/i] was causing 90%+ of the problem, GSF a small percantage and SCP even less. The answer was to nerf [i]Spell Power[/i], OK done. But they didn't stop there, they went on and nerfed GSF, and then SCP [b]and then bombed SF[/b]! Making change after change that did nothing other than further reduce the effectiveness of already weak options. All the while leaving the really abusive stuff like [i]Gate[/i] and [i]Mords Disjunction[/i] alone.... [/QUOTE]

Verification