Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dimwhit" data-source="post: 1015079" data-attributes="member: 2576">Well, I didn't intend this to be a debate on the strength/weakness of Rogues. But since you guys started it...<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> I have a 16th level Rogue who recently got a Ring of Blinking. So when it's activated, he pretty much gets to sneak every time (unless the creature is immune - which I'll admit it happening more and more). He does great damage, but our Barbarian still outshines him in that category.That's partly why my Rogue is becoming a wannabee (sp?) Wizard. He has such a high UMD that he can use wands all he wants, he's almost always successful casting off scrolls, and he almost never fails activating a device blindly. He's becoming very, very handy. I love the character. And he's straight Rogue. No PrCs.Anyway, I really wanted to check to make sure Rogues still could use sneak damage for as many attacks as they had, which is sounds like they still do. That's good. They're not overpowered, IMO, with it like that. Nor do I think, however, that they're underpowered. I'm quite happy with them as they are.At least WotC left the Rogue alone, for the most part.</blockquote>