Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
3.5 Soulknife - Does it need a power point reserve?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Voadam" data-source="post: 4596385" data-attributes="member: 2209"><p>Yes, even with that language.</p><p></p><p>"This substitution feature replaces the standard soulknife's free Wild Talent feat. Since all Kalashtar gain power points for free, the character does not need this feat to matierialize his mind blade."</p><p></p><p>I'll assume Kalashtar are like Xephs:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So Xephs and Kalashtar have power points.</p><p></p><p>The parenthetical says: "This class feature provides the character with the psionic power he needs to materialize his mind blade, if he has no power points otherwise" which seems to say that having power points outside of wild talent is an alternate possibility for having the psionic power needed to materialize a mindblade.</p><p></p><p>The racial substitution level seems to take advantage of that possibility and make it a reality.</p><p></p><p>This can be interpreted either way and not be logically incoherent. The psionic designation from wild talent could be irrelevant to powering the mindblade and it is only the retained power points that provide the power to manifest a mindblade. Alternately it could be that the class feature wild talent is all that is needed while having a different source of power points is an alternate method. Both are logically consistent with the wording RAW including these later written racial substitution levels.</p><p></p><p>However looking to outside sources and references provides more contrasts. </p><p></p><p>When things required a power reserve in 3.0 they said things like "The mind-blade can be used as long as the soulknife’s power point reserve is 1 or more." or "While the character retains 1 or more power points, his or her mind automatically generates a tangible field of force that provides a +4 armor bonus to AC."</p><p></p><p>Even in 3.5 when they require you to have power points they say it directly, not imply it indirectly "If you have 1 or more power points available, you can meditate to attempt to become psionically focused."</p><p></p><p>So instead of using explicit existing language which cannot be interpreted to not require a power point reserve the 3.5 soulknife uses ambiguous language that can reasonably be interpreted not to require a power point reserve.</p><p></p><p>The language "have power points <strong>available</strong>" from the psionic focus section also sounds like a distinction from the "has no power points otherwise" language of the soulknife wild talent parenthetical which does not specify "power points <strong>available</strong>".</p><p></p><p>I'd say that with the 3.0 power reserve language excised and the parenthetical being open to either interpretation but requiring an indirect implication using language dissimilar from the other examples of power reserve requirements the preponderance of the evidence is that the no power reserve interpretation is more likely correct.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Voadam, post: 4596385, member: 2209"] Yes, even with that language. "This substitution feature replaces the standard soulknife's free Wild Talent feat. Since all Kalashtar gain power points for free, the character does not need this feat to matierialize his mind blade." I'll assume Kalashtar are like Xephs: So Xephs and Kalashtar have power points. The parenthetical says: "This class feature provides the character with the psionic power he needs to materialize his mind blade, if he has no power points otherwise" which seems to say that having power points outside of wild talent is an alternate possibility for having the psionic power needed to materialize a mindblade. The racial substitution level seems to take advantage of that possibility and make it a reality. This can be interpreted either way and not be logically incoherent. The psionic designation from wild talent could be irrelevant to powering the mindblade and it is only the retained power points that provide the power to manifest a mindblade. Alternately it could be that the class feature wild talent is all that is needed while having a different source of power points is an alternate method. Both are logically consistent with the wording RAW including these later written racial substitution levels. However looking to outside sources and references provides more contrasts. When things required a power reserve in 3.0 they said things like "The mind-blade can be used as long as the soulknife’s power point reserve is 1 or more." or "While the character retains 1 or more power points, his or her mind automatically generates a tangible field of force that provides a +4 armor bonus to AC." Even in 3.5 when they require you to have power points they say it directly, not imply it indirectly "If you have 1 or more power points available, you can meditate to attempt to become psionically focused." So instead of using explicit existing language which cannot be interpreted to not require a power point reserve the 3.5 soulknife uses ambiguous language that can reasonably be interpreted not to require a power point reserve. The language "have power points [B]available[/B]" from the psionic focus section also sounds like a distinction from the "has no power points otherwise" language of the soulknife wild talent parenthetical which does not specify "power points [B]available[/B]". I'd say that with the 3.0 power reserve language excised and the parenthetical being open to either interpretation but requiring an indirect implication using language dissimilar from the other examples of power reserve requirements the preponderance of the evidence is that the no power reserve interpretation is more likely correct. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
3.5 Soulknife - Does it need a power point reserve?
Top